Texas § 325.011 CRITERIA FOR REVIEW.

Texas Statutes

§ 325.011 — CRITERIA FOR REVIEW.

Texas § 325.011

Code GVGovernment Code

This text of Texas § 325.011 (CRITERIA FOR REVIEW.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tex. Government Code Code Ann. § 325.011 (2026).

Text

Sec. 325.011. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW. The commission and its staff shall consider the following criteria in determining whether a public need exists for the continuation of a state agency or its advisory committees or for the performance of the functions of the agency or its advisory committees:

(1)the efficiency and effectiveness with which the agency or the advisory committee operates;

(2)(A) an identification of the mission, goals, and objectives intended for the agency or advisory committee and of the problem or need that the agency or advisory committee was intended to address; and

(B)the extent to which the mission, goals, and objectives have been achieved and the problem or need has been addressed;

(3)(A) an identification of any activities of the agency in addition to those granted

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sec. 325.011. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW. The commission and its staff shall consider the following criteria in determining whether a public need exists for the continuation of a state agency or its advisory committees or for the performance of the functions of the agency or its advisory committees:
(1) the efficiency and effectiveness with which the agency or the advisory committee operates;
(2)(A) an identification of the mission, goals, and objectives intended for the agency or advisory committee and of the problem or need that the agency or advisory committee was intended to address; and
(B) the extent to which the mission, goals, and objectives have been achieved and the problem or need has been addressed;
(3)(A) an identification of any activities of the agency in addition to those granted by statute and of the authority for those activities; and
(B) the extent to which those activities are needed;
(4) an assessment of authority of the agency relating to fees, inspections, enforcement, and penalties;
(5) whether less restrictive or alternative methods of performing any function that the agency performs could adequately protect or provide service to the public;
(6) the extent to which the jurisdiction of the agency and the programs administered by the agency overlap or duplicate those of other agencies, the extent to which the agency coordinates with those agencies, and the extent to which the programs administered by the agency can be consolidated with the programs of other state agencies;
(7) the promptness and effectiveness with which the agency addresses complaints concerning entities or other persons affected by the agency, including an assessment of the agency's administrative hearings process;
(8) an assessment of the agency's rulemaking process and the extent to which the agency has encouraged participation by the public in making its rules and decisions and the extent to which the public participation has resulted in rules that benefit the public;
(9) the extent to which the agency has complied with:
(A) federal and state laws and applicable rules regarding equality of employment opportunity and the rights and privacy of individuals; and
(B) state law and applicable rules of any state agency regarding purchasing guidelines and programs for historically underutilized businesses;
(10) the extent to which the agency issues and enforces rules relating to potential conflicts of interest of its employees;
(11) the extent to which the agency complies with Chapters 551 and 552 and follows records management practices that enable the agency to respond efficiently to requests for public information;
(12) the effect of federal intervention or loss of federal funds if the agency is abolished;
(13) the extent to which the purpose and effectiveness of reporting requirements imposed on the agency justifies the continuation of the requirement;
(14) an assessment of the agency's cybersecurity practices using confidential information available from the Department of Information Resources, the Texas Cyber Command, or any other appropriate state agency; and
(15) an assessment of the agency's use of artificial intelligence systems, as that term is defined by Section 551.001 , Business & Commerce Code, in its operations and its oversight of the use of artificial intelligence systems by persons under the agency's jurisdiction, and any related impact on the agency's ability to achieve its mission, goals, and objectives, made using information available from the Department of Information Resources, the attorney general, or any other appropriate state agency.

Legislative History

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 479, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5.95(83), (94), eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1319, Sec. 33, eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1499, Sec. 1.06, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Amended by: Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 928 (H.B. 3249 ), Sec. 1.06, eff. June 15, 2007. Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 668 (S.B. 1618 ), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2011. Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 990 (H.B. 1781 ), Sec. 5, eff. June 17, 2011. Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 683 (H.B. 8 ), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2017. Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 331 (H.B. 150 ), Sec. 21, eff. September 1, 2025. Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1174 (H.B. 149 ), Sec. 5, eff. January 1, 2026.