Tennessee Statutes
§ 47-9-327 — Priority of security interests in deposit account
Tennessee·Title 47
The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same deposit account:
(1)A security interest held by a secured party having control of the deposit account under § 47-9-104 has priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control.
(2)Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), security interests perfected by control under § 47-9-314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control.
(3)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (4), a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.
(4)A security interest perfected by control under § 47-9-104(a)(3) has priority over a security interest
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tennessee § 47-9-327 (Priority of security interests in deposit account) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Bank, FSB v. Cornerstone Community Bank
903 F. Supp. 2d 568 (E.D. Tennessee, 2012)
Legislative History
Acts 2000, ch. 846, § 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 47-1-101
Short title§ 47-1-102
Scope of chapter§ 47-1-104
Construction against implied repeal§ 47-1-105
Severability§ 47-1-106
Use of singular and plural - Gender§ 47-1-201
General definitions§ 47-1-202
Notice - Knowledge§ 47-1-204
Value§ 47-1-205
Reasonable time - Seasonableness§ 47-1-206
Presumptions§ 47-1-302
Variation by agreement