Tennessee Statutes

§ 47-9-327 — Priority of security interests in deposit account

Tennessee § 47-9-327

This text of Tennessee § 47-9-327 (Priority of security interests in deposit account) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-327 (2026).

Text

The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same deposit account:

(1)A security interest held by a secured party having control of the deposit account under § 47-9-104 has priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control.
(2)Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), security interests perfected by control under § 47-9-314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control.
(3)Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (4), a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.
(4)A security interest perfected by control under § 47-9-104(a)(3) has priority over a security interest

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Bank, FSB v. Cornerstone Community Bank
903 F. Supp. 2d 568 (E.D. Tennessee, 2012)

Legislative History

Acts 2000, ch. 846, § 1.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 47-9-327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/47-9-327.