Tennessee Statutes
§ 47-9-105 — Control of electronic chattel paper
Tennessee § 47-9-105
JurisdictionTennessee
Title47
This text of Tennessee § 47-9-105 (Control of electronic chattel paper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-105 (2026).
Text
(a)General rule: control of electronic chattel paper. A secured party has control of electronic chattel paper if a system employed for evidencing the transfer of interests in the chattel paper reliably establishes the secured party as the person to which the chattel paper was assigned.
(b)Specific facts giving control. A system satisfies subsection (a) if the record or records comprising the chattel paper are created, stored, and assigned in such a manner that:
(1)A single authoritative copy of the record or records exists which is unique, identifiable and, except as otherwise provided in subdivisions (b)(4), (5), and (6), unalterable;
(2)The authoritative copy identifies the secured party as the assignee of the record or records;
(3)The authoritative copy is communicated to and maint
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
USBI Co. v. Otha C. Jean & Associates, Inc. (In Re Otha C. Jean & Associates, Inc.)
152 B.R. 219 (E.D. Tennessee, 1993)
Mays v. Brighton Bank
832 S.W.2d 347 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)
Keep Fresh Filters, Inc. v. Reguli
888 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1994)
American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.
631 S.W.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1981)
Union Planters Nat. Bank of Memphis v. Markowitz
468 F. Supp. 529 (W.D. Tennessee, 1979)
Commerce Union Bank v. May
503 S.W.2d 112 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1973)
Cookeville Production Credit Ass'n v. Frazier (In Re Frazier)
16 B.R. 674 (M.D. Tennessee, 1981)
Craig v. Union County Bank (In Re Crabtree)
48 B.R. 528 (E.D. Tennessee, 1985)
H & I Pipe & Supply Co. v. First National Bank of Crossville (In Re H & I Pipe & Supply Co.)
44 B.R. 949 (M.D. Tennessee, 1984)
Peoples Bank of Polk County v. McDonald (In Re Maryville Savings & Loan Corp.)
27 B.R. 701 (E.D. Tennessee, 1983)
Hamilton Bank of Morristown v. Bank of Commerce (In Re Morristown Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.)
25 B.R. 377 (E.D. Tennessee, 1982)
In Re King
10 B.R. 685 (E.D. Tennessee, 1981)
Peoples Bank of Polk County v. McDonald (In Re Maryville Savings & Loan Corp.)
31 B.R. 597 (E.D. Tennessee, 1983)
Fugate v. Carter County Bank (In Re Webb)
187 B.R. 221 (E.D. Tennessee, 1995)
Lynn v. Financial Solutions Corp. (In Re Lynn)
173 B.R. 894 (M.D. Tennessee, 1994)
McLemore v. Carson Ltd. (In re Sealy)
34 B.R. 947 (M.D. Tennessee, 1983)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Third National Bank in Nashville
812 S.W.2d 593 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
Peoples Bank of Elk Valley v. Murfreesboro Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Lee)
14 B.R. 804 (E.D. Tennessee, 1981)
Hill v. Earthman (In Re Hill)
83 B.R. 522 (E.D. Tennessee, 1988)
Huddleston v. Castle (In re Stewart)
21 B.R. 329 (E.D. Tennessee, 1982)
Legislative History
Acts 2000, ch. 846, § 1; 2012 , ch. 708, § 4.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 47-1-101
Short title§ 47-1-102
Scope of chapter§ 47-1-104
Construction against implied repeal§ 47-1-105
Severability§ 47-1-106
Use of singular and plural - Gender§ 47-1-201
General definitions§ 47-1-202
Notice - Knowledge§ 47-1-204
Value§ 47-1-205
Reasonable time - Seasonableness§ 47-1-206
Presumptions§ 47-1-302
Variation by agreementCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 47-9-105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/47-9-105.