Tennessee Statutes
§ 29-27-201 — Sale for division authorized
Tennessee § 29-27-201
JurisdictionTennessee
Title29
This text of Tennessee § 29-27-201 (Sale for division authorized) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-27-201 (2026).
Text
Any person entitled to a partition of premises, under part 1 of this chapter, is equally entitled to have such premises sold for division, in the following cases:
(1)If the premises are so situated that partition thereof cannot be made; or (2) Where the premises are of such description that it would be manifestly for the advantage of the parties that the same should be sold instead of partitioned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coates v. Thompson
713 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1986)
Gray v. Todd
819 S.W.2d 104 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
Gober v. Burrus
726 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1986)
Moyers v. Moyers
871 S.W.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1993)
McKENZIE BANKING CO. v. Couch
332 S.W.3d 349 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2010)
Mike Breen v. Janice C. Sharp
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017)
Honey Bunch v. B.F. Bunch
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2015)
Nancy Crawford v. Roger Crawford
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2002)
In Re: Estate of Donald Carl Battle
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017)
Steven J. Thomas v. Jeffrey M. Thomas v. Delmus L. Thomas
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017)
Emma Lou Hale v. Gerald D. Hale and Bonnie F. Hale
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009)
Teresa Miles v. Earl Pace
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
David Rivkin v. Lori Postal
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2000)
Taylor Brocato (now Dunn) v. Kyle Young
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2024)
Jerry Green v. Cynthia Panter
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2024)
Joann Potts v. Walter Ansel Rogers, Jr.
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2004)
Joseph P. Rusnak v. Gail Phebus
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2008)
Commercial Credit v. Est. of Arthur Smith
(Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1998)
Legislative History
Code 1858, § 3293 (deriv. Acts 1827, ch. 54, § 1; 1829, ch. 35, § 1; 1853-1854, ch. 48, § 1); Shan., § 5042; Code 1932, § 9197; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-2128.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1-101
Application of equitable remedies§ 29-1-102
Injunction pending litigation§ 29-1-103
Receivers pending litigation§ 29-1-104
Receiver's bond§ 29-1-106
Judges granting extraordinary process§ 29-1-107
Statement as to first application§ 29-1-108
Application after refusal§ 29-1-109
Endorsement of refusal§ 29-1-110
Transmission of bill and fiat to clerk§ 29-1-111
Scope of provisions§ 29-10-101
Chapter definitions§ 29-10-103
Enforcement of chapterCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Tennessee § 29-27-201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/tn/29-27-201.