South Dakota Statutes
§ 37-29-1 — Definitions.
South Dakota § 37-29-1
This text of South Dakota § 37-29-1 (Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 37-29-1 (2026).
Text
Terms used in this chapter mean:
(1)"Improper," includes theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach, or inducement of a breach of a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means;
(2)"Misappropriation," (i) Acquisition of a trade secret of another by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means; or (ii) Disclosure or use of a trade secret of another without express or implied consent by a person who:
(A)Used improper means to acquire knowledge of the trade secret; or (B) At the time of disclosure or use, knew or had reason to know that such knowledge of the trade secret was:
(I)Derived from or through a person who had utilized improper means to acquire it;
(II)Acquired under circumstances givin
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.
2011 S.D. 13 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)
Paint Brush Corp. v. Neu
1999 SD 120 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Centrol, Inc. v. Morrow
489 N.W.2d 890 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Weins v. Sporleder
1997 SD 111 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Broin & Associates, Inc. v. Genencor International, Inc.
232 F.R.D. 335 (D. South Dakota, 2005)
Aqreva, LLC v. Eide Bailly, LLP
950 N.W.2d 774 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2020)
Daktronics, Inc. v. McAfee
1999 SD 113 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Dt-Trak Consulting, Inc. v. Kolda
979 N.W.2d 304 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2022)
Daktronics
1999 SD 113 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
gpac, LLP v. Andersen
(D. South Dakota, 2022)
Jim Hawk Truck-Trailers of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Crossroads Trailer Sales & Service, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2021)
POET, LLC v. Nelson Engineering, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2019)
Richmond v. Weise
(D. South Dakota, 2024)
Sterling Computers Corp. v. Fling
(D. South Dakota, 2019)
Sterling Computers Corporation v. Haskell
(D. South Dakota, 2018)
Viet Family, Inc. v. Freidel
(D. South Dakota, 2024)
Legislative History
SL 1988, ch 354, § 1; SL 1994, ch 351, § 89.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 37-1-11.1
Demand by attorney general to produce evidence relating to violations--Service--Contents.§ 37-1-11.2
Petition for enforcement of attorney general's demand--Court order--Protective provisions.§ 37-1-11.4
Self§ 37-1-14.1
Venue of actions for violation.§ 37-1-14.4
Limitation of actions for violations.§ 37-1-15
Repealed§ 37-1-17
Repealed§ 37-1-19
RepealedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 37-29-1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/37-29-1.