South Dakota Statutes
§ 37-24-31 — Action for damages brought by person adversely affected.
South Dakota § 37-24-31
JurisdictionSouth Dakota
Title 37TRADE REGULATION
Ch. 37-23DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
This text of South Dakota § 37-24-31 (Action for damages brought by person adversely affected.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 37-24-31 (2026).
Text
Any person who claims to have been adversely affected by any act or a practice declared to be unlawful by § 37-24-6 shall be permitted to bring a civil action for the recovery of actual damages suffered as a result of such act or practice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moss v. Guttormson
1996 SD 76 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health System
2007 SD 34 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.
908 F.3d 313 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Sisney v. Best Inc.
2008 SD 70 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2008)
Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Co.
103 F. Supp. 2d 1169 (D. South Dakota, 2000)
Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.
643 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. South Dakota, 2009)
Wyman v. Terry Schulte Chevrolet, Inc.
1998 SD 96 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
NORTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE v. Union Carbide Corp.
236 F. Supp. 2d 966 (D. South Dakota, 2002)
First Choice Enterprises, Inc. v. City Magnets, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2024)
Hyde v. Franklin American Mortgage Company
(D. South Dakota, 2020)
Moss v. Guttormsom
1996 SD 76 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Smith v. Stellar Restoration Services, LLC
(D. South Dakota, 2021)
South Dakota Wheat Growers Association v. Chief Industries, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2018)
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2021)
Symens v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
593 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (D. South Dakota, 1999)
Legislative History
SL 1971, ch 218, § 8.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 37-1-11.1
Demand by attorney general to produce evidence relating to violations--Service--Contents.§ 37-1-11.2
Petition for enforcement of attorney general's demand--Court order--Protective provisions.§ 37-1-11.4
Self§ 37-1-14.1
Venue of actions for violation.§ 37-1-14.4
Limitation of actions for violations.§ 37-1-15
Repealed§ 37-1-17
Repealed§ 37-1-19
RepealedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 37-24-31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/37-24-31.