Home/South Dakota/Statutes/Title 37: TRADE REGULATION/Ch. 37-23: DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION/§ 37-24-31
South Dakota Statutes

§ 37-24-31 — Action for damages brought by person adversely affected.

South Dakota·Title 37 TRADE REGULATION·Ch. 37-23 DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
Any person who claims to have been adversely affected by any act or a practice declared to be unlawful by § 37-24-6 shall be permitted to bring a civil action for the recovery of actual damages suffered as a result of such act or practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Dakota § 37-24-31 (Action for damages brought by person adversely affected.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. Guttormson
1996 SD 76 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
133 case citations
Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health System
2007 SD 34 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
66 case citations
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.
908 F.3d 313 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
50 case citations
Sisney v. Best Inc.
2008 SD 70 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2008)
29 case citations
Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Co.
103 F. Supp. 2d 1169 (D. South Dakota, 2000)
18 case citations
Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.
643 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (D. South Dakota, 2009)
10 case citations
Wyman v. Terry Schulte Chevrolet, Inc.
1998 SD 96 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
10 case citations
NORTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE v. Union Carbide Corp.
236 F. Supp. 2d 966 (D. South Dakota, 2002)
9 case citations
First Choice Enterprises, Inc. v. City Magnets, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2024)
Hyde v. Franklin American Mortgage Company
(D. South Dakota, 2020)
Moss v. Guttormsom
1996 SD 76 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Smith v. Stellar Restoration Services, LLC
(D. South Dakota, 2021)
South Dakota Wheat Growers Association v. Chief Industries, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2018)
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.
(D. South Dakota, 2021)
Symens v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
593 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (D. South Dakota, 1999)

Legislative History

SL 1971, ch 218, § 8.

Nearby Sections

15
§ 37-1-10
Criminal prosecution by state's attorney on violation--Assistance by attorney general.
§ 37-1-11
Criminal proceedings instituted by attorney general.
§ 37-1-11.1
Demand by attorney general to produce evidence relating to violations--Service--Contents.
§ 37-1-11.2
Petition for enforcement of attorney general's demand--Court order--Protective provisions.
§ 37-1-11.3
Confidentiality of evidence produced on demand--Waiver.
§ 37-1-11.4
Self
§ 37-1-14.1
Venue of actions for violation.
§ 37-1-14.2
Actions on behalf of state for equitable relief and civil penalties--Amount of penalty.
§ 37-1-14.3
Action by public or private party for equitable relief or damages--Treble damages.
§ 37-1-14.4
Limitation of actions for violations.
§ 37-1-15
Repealed
§ 37-1-16.1
Judgment in action by state as prima facie evidence in later actions.
§ 37-1-17
Repealed
§ 37-1-18
Failure to attend or produce evidence as contempt.
§ 37-1-19
Repealed
View on official source ↗