South Dakota Statutes
§ 23A-24-2 — Order of proceedings at trial.
South Dakota § 23A-24-2
This text of South Dakota § 23A-24-2 (Order of proceedings at trial.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-24-2 (2026).
Text
After a jury has been impaneled and sworn, a trial must proceed in the following order:
(1)If the indictment or information is for a felony, the clerk or prosecuting attorney must read it and state the plea of the defendant to the jury. In all other cases this formality may be dispensed with;
(2)The prosecuting attorney or other counsel for the state must make an opening statement and offer the evidence in support of the indictment or information;
(3)The defendant or his counsel may then open his defense and offer his evidence in support thereof. However, the defendant or his counsel may make his opening statement immediately after the prosecuting attorney's opening statement;
(4)The parties may then, respectively, offer rebutting evidence only, unless the court, for good r
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Wilson
297 N.W.2d 477 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Luna
378 N.W.2d 229 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
Miller v. State
338 N.W.2d 673 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Phillips
489 N.W.2d 613 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Stuck
434 N.W.2d 43 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Maves
358 N.W.2d 805 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Ellefson
287 N.W.2d 493 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1980)
Richard Allen Nerison v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
715 F.2d 415 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)
State v. Orelup
520 N.W.2d 898 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Mitchell
491 N.W.2d 438 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Busack
532 N.W.2d 413 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Hickey
287 N.W.2d 502 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1980)
James Leroy Nelson v. Herman Solem, Warden
640 F.2d 133 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Legislative History
Supreme Court Rule 396, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3627; SDCL, § 23-42-6; SL 1978, ch 178, § 302.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 23A-10-2
Form of plea raising defense.§ 23A-10A-1
Definition of mental incompetency.§ 23A-10A-10
Expense of maintenance of defendant committed.§ 23A-10A-13
Approved facility defined.§ 23A-10A-13.1
Restoration to competency program defined.§ 23A-10A-14
Facility's report--Length of commitment determined--Review after one year--Dismissal on court finding.§ 23A-10A-15
Length of detention for Class A, B, or C felony.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 23A-24-2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/23A-24-2.