South Dakota Statutes
§ 23A-22-14 — Proof of incorporation of bank not required in forgery or counterfeiting prosecution--Expert testimony as to forgery or counterfeiting.
South Dakota § 23A-22-14
This text of South Dakota § 23A-22-14 (Proof of incorporation of bank not required in forgery or counterfeiting prosecution--Expert testimony as to forgery or counterfeiting.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-22-14 (2026).
Text
In prosecutions for forging a bill or note of an incorporated company or bank, or for passing or attempting to pass, or having in possession with intent to pass, any such forged bill or note, it is not necessary to prove the incorporation of the bank or company by its charter or act of incorporation, but it may be proved by general reputation, and persons of skill are competent witnesses to prove that such bill or note is forged or counterfeited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
Supreme Court Rule 401, 1939; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 34.3641; SDCL, § 23-44-14; SL 1978, ch 178, § 286.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 23A-10-2
Form of plea raising defense.§ 23A-10A-1
Definition of mental incompetency.§ 23A-10A-10
Expense of maintenance of defendant committed.§ 23A-10A-13
Approved facility defined.§ 23A-10A-13.1
Restoration to competency program defined.§ 23A-10A-14
Facility's report--Length of commitment determined--Review after one year--Dismissal on court finding.§ 23A-10A-15
Length of detention for Class A, B, or C felony.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 23A-22-14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/23A-22-14.