South Dakota Statutes
§ 21-27-16 — Causes for discharge of applicant committed on judicial process.
South Dakota § 21-27-16
This text of South Dakota § 21-27-16 (Causes for discharge of applicant committed on judicial process.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 21-27-16 (2026).
Text
If it appears on the return of a writ of habeas corpus that the applicant is in custody by virtue of process from any court legally constituted, he can be discharged only for one or more of the following causes:
(1)When the court has exceeded the limit of its jurisdiction, either as to the matter, place, sum, or person;
(2)Where, though the original imprisonment was lawful, yet by some act, omission, or event, which has subsequently taken place, the party has become entitled to his discharge;
(3)Where the process is defective in some substantial form required by law;
(4)Where the process, though in proper form, has been issued in a case or under circumstances where the laws do not allow process or orders for imprisonment or arrest to issue;
(5)When, although in proper f
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goodroad v. Solem
406 N.W.2d 141 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Cowell v. Leapley
458 N.W.2d 514 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Black v. Class
1997 SD 22 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Lykken v. Class
1997 SD 29 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Jenner v. Leapley
521 N.W.2d 422 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Petrilli v. Leapley
491 N.W.2d 79 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Security Savings Bank v. Mueller
308 N.W.2d 761 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re the Application of Thomas Ex Rel. Schmit
360 N.W.2d 513 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
Flute v. Class
1997 SD 10 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
O'CONNOR v. Leapley
488 N.W.2d 421 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Everitt v. Solem
412 N.W.2d 119 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Weiker v. Solem
515 N.W.2d 827 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Tibbetts v. State
336 N.W.2d 658 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Application of Painter
179 N.W.2d 12 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1970)
Gross v. Solem
446 N.W.2d 49 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
Brakeall v. Weber
2003 SD 90 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2003)
Lange v. Weber
1999 SD 138 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Burkett
2014 SD 38 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Application of Grosh
415 N.W.2d 824 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus for Kozak
256 N.W.2d 717 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1977)
Legislative History
CCrimP 1877, § 673; CL 1887, § 7841; RCCrimP 1903, § 773; SL 1915, ch 145; RC 1919, § 4980; SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 37.5504.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 21-1-11
Repealed§ 21-1-13
Repealed§ 21-1-13.2
Application of interest statutes.§ 21-1-14
Liability of issuer of bad check for collection costs--Costs included in restitution award.§ 21-1-15
Definitions.§ 21-1-3
Damages to be reasonable.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 21-27-16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/21-27-16.