South Dakota Statutes
§ 15-26A-40 — New undertaking required when security insufficient--Dismissal of appeal or vacation of stay on failure to file new undertaking.
South Dakota § 15-26A-40
This text of South Dakota § 15-26A-40 (New undertaking required when security insufficient--Dismissal of appeal or vacation of stay on failure to file new undertaking.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S.D. Codified Laws § 15-26A-40 (2026).
Text
The Supreme Court, upon satisfactory proof that any surety to an undertaking given under this title has become insolvent, or that his circumstances have become so precarious that there is reason to apprehend that the undertaking is insufficient security, may in its discretion require the appellant to file and serve a new undertaking, with such sureties and in such time as shall be prescribed, and that in default thereof the appeal shall be dismissed or the stay of proceedings vacated, and the execution or performance of the judgment or order be allowed to be enforced without further delay.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Landstrom v. Shaver
1996 SD 49 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Legislative History
SDC 1939 & Supp 1960, § 33.0725; SDCL, §
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
South Dakota § 15-26A-40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sd/15-26A-40.