South Dakota Statutes
§ 1-26-36 — Weight given to agency findings--Disposition of case--Grounds for reversal or modification--Findings and conclusions--Costs.
The court shall give great weight to the findings made and inferences drawn by an agency on questions of fact. The court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings. The court may reverse or modify the decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:
(1)In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions;
(2)In excess of the statutory authority of the agency;
(3)Made upon unlawful procedure;
(4)Affected by other error of law;
(5)Clearly erroneous in light of the entire evidence in the record; or (6) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion. A court shall enter i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Dakota § 1-26-36 (Weight given to agency findings--Disposition of case--Grounds for reversal or modification--Findings and conclusions--Costs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.
489 N.W.2d 353 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Application of Ed Phillips & Sons Company
195 N.W.2d 400 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1972)
Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.
317 N.W.2d 417 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)
Brown v. Douglas School District
2002 SD 92 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad v. Board of Commissioners
248 N.W.2d 386 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1976)
Butte County v. Vallery
1999 SD 142 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Telephone Authority v. Public Utilities Commission
1999 SD 60 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Application of Northern States Power Co.
328 N.W.2d 852 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Burke v. Butte County
2002 SD 17 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Aadland v. St. Luke's Midland Regional Medical Center
537 N.W.2d 666 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
AFSCME—Local 1025 Sioux Falls School Maintenance & Custodial Workers v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5
2000 SD 20 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)
Andreson v. Brink Electric Construction Co.
1997 SD 104 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Anderson v. Nash Finch Wholesale Fruit & Grocery Co.
215 N.W.2d 125 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1974)
Ashland v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division
321 N.W.2d 103 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)
Bon Homme County Commission v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Local 1743A
2005 SD 76 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2005)
Associated School Boards of South Dakota, Inc. v. Hughes County
2002 SD 41 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Baker v. Dakota Mining & Construction
529 N.W.2d 583 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Bracken v. Dlr Reemployment Assistance Division
2023 S.D. 22 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2023)
Application of Black Hills Power
2016 SD 92 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)
At & T Corp. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue
2002 SD 25 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Legislative History
SL 1966, ch 159, § 15 (7); SL 1972, ch 8, § 29; SL 1977, ch 13, § 16; SL 1978, ch 13, § 10; SL 1978, ch 17; SL 1983, ch 6, § 2.