South Carolina Statutes

§ 31-21-70 — Application and exceptions.

South Carolina § 31-21-70
JurisdictionSouth Carolina
Title 31HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
Ch. 21FAIR HOUSING LAW

This text of South Carolina § 31-21-70 (Application and exceptions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.C. Code Ann. § 31-21-70 (2026).

Text

(A)Nothing in Section 31-21-40 or 31-21-60 applies to rooms or units in dwellings containing living quarters occupied or intended to be occupied by no more than four families living independently of each other, if the owner actually maintains and occupies one of the living quarters as his residence.
(B)Nothing in Section 31-21-40 or 31-21-60 applies to any single-family house sold or rented by an owner when:
(1)the private individual owner does not own more than three single-family houses at any one time; and (2) in the sale of any single-family house by a private individual owner not residing in the house at the time of the sale or who was not the most recent resident of the house before the sale, the exemption granted by this subsection applies only with respect to one sale within a t

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Legislative History

HISTORY: 1989 Act No. 72, SECTION 1; 2019 Act No. 44 (S.281), SECTION 6, eff May 16, 2019. Editor's Note 2019 Act No. 44, preamble, provides as follows: "Whereas, service animals that are properly trained to assist persons with disabilities play a vital role in establishing independence for such persons; and "Whereas, the term 'service animal' has a distinct meaning in the law. A service animal means an animal that is trained for the purposes of assisting or accommodating the sensory, mental, or physical disability of a disabled person. Under the law, the provision of emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship does not constitute the work or tasks of a service animal; and "Whereas, no vest, other marking, or documentation is required for an animal to qualify as a service animal, nor are such vests, markings, or documentation a reliable indication of whether an animal is, by law, a service animal. People sometimes erroneously think that a therapy animal, an emotional support animal, or any animal wearing a vest or having any other type of marking is a service animal as defined by law; and "Whereas, there is an increasing number of occurrences in which people exploit the confusion related to service animals and attempt to bring an animal into a place that it would otherwise not be allowed to enter by passing off the pet, therapy animal, or emotional support animal as a service animal, either by oral misrepresentation, placement of a vest or other marking on the animal, or presentation of a 'certificate', despite knowing that it is not a service animal; and "Whereas, some companies mislead individuals into believing that they will be entitled to the rights or privileges for individuals with disabilities with service animals if they buy the company's vests or obtain some type of certificate. These misrepresentations, in some cases, are unlawful deceptive trade practices and compound the confusion around service animals; and "Whereas, commendably, federal and state laws require places of public accommodation, including airports, restaurants, theaters, stores, hospitals, and more, to allow any animal that is presented as a service animal into the place of public accommodation. These same places of public accommodation face a dilemma if someone enters the premises and intentionally misrepresents his animal as a service animal; and "Whereas, when people try to falsely represent a nonservice animal as a service animal, business owners and other places of public accommodation become increasingly distrustful that the animals being represented to them as service animals are, in fact, service animals. Misrepresentation of service animals delegitimizes the program and makes it harder for persons with disabilities to gain unquestioned acceptance of their legitimate, properly trained, and essential service animals. Now, therefore, [Text of Act]." Effect of Amendment 2019 Act No. 44, SECTION 6, added (N), allowing landlords to ask certain questions regarding a tenant's or prospective tenant's animal for purposes of reasonable accommodations.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
South Carolina § 31-21-70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/sc/21/31-21-70.