Pennsylvania § 5909 Review by a board of review

Pennsylvania Statutes

§ 5909 — Review by a board of review

Pennsylvania § 5909

Title 51MILITARY AFFAIRS

PartPART IV

Ch. 59POSTTRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW

This text of Pennsylvania § 5909 (Review by a board of review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

51 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5909 (2026).

Text

(a)Composition of boards of review.--The State Judge Advocate may constitute one or more boards of review, each composed of not less than three commissioned officers, each of whom shall be a member of the bar of the Supreme Court, and one of whom shall be a judge advocate of the Pennsylvania National Guard.

(b)Affirming findings and sentence.--In a case referred to it, the board of review may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. It may affirm only such findings of guilty and a sentence, or such part or amount of the sentence, as it finds correct in law and fact and determines, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. In considering the record, it shall have authority to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witne

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) Composition of boards of review.--The State Judge Advocate may constitute one or more boards of review, each composed of not less than three commissioned officers, each of whom shall be a member of the bar of the Supreme Court, and one of whom shall be a judge advocate of the Pennsylvania National Guard.

(b) Affirming findings and sentence.--In a case referred to it, the board of review may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. It may affirm only such findings of guilty and a sentence, or such part or amount of the sentence, as it finds correct in law and fact and determines, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. In considering the record, it shall have authority to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses and determine controverted questions of fact, recognizing that the trial court saw and heard the witnesses.

(c) Setting aside findings and sentence.--If the board of review sets aside the findings and sentence, it may, except where the setting aside is based on lack of sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, order a rehearing. If it sets aside the findings and sentence and does not order a rehearing, it shall order that the charges be dismissed.

(d) Action by convening authority.--The State Judge Advocate shall, unless there is to be further action by the Governor, instruct the convening authority to take action in accordance with the decision of the board of review. If the board of review has ordered a rehearing but the convening authority finds a rehearing impracticable, the convening authority may dismiss the charges.

(e) Uniform rules of procedure.--In the event one or more boards of review are constituted in accordance with this section, the State Judge Advocate shall prescribe uniform rules of procedure for proceedings in and before such board or boards of review.

(f) Waiver of review.--The accused may file with the convening authority a statement expressly withdrawing the right of the accused to have his case reviewed by a board of review. Such a withdrawal shall be signed by both the accused and defense counsel and must be filed in accordance with appellate procedures as provided by law. The accused may withdraw his case from review by a board of review at any time in accordance with appellate procedures as provided by law.