Oklahoma § 15-566 Prima facie evidence of illegality of contract and

Oklahoma Statutes

§ 15-566 — Prima facie evidence of illegality of contract and

Oklahoma § 15-566

Title 15Contracts

This text of Oklahoma § 15-566 (Prima facie evidence of illegality of contract and) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 15-566 (2026).

Text

operation of bucketshop. Every person shall furnish upon demand to any principal for whom such person has executed any contract of sale for the future delivery of any cotton, grain, stocks or other commodities a written instrument setting forth the name and location of the exchange, board of trade or similar institution upon which such contract has been executed, the date of execution of the contract and the name and address of the persons with whom such contract was executed and if such person shall refuse or neglect to furnish such statement upon reasonable demand, such refusal or neglect shall be prima facie evidence that such contract was an illegal contract within the provisions of Section 4, of this act, and that the person who executed it was engaged in the maintenance and operation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

operation of bucketshop. Every person shall furnish upon demand to any principal for whom such person has executed any contract of sale for the future delivery of any cotton, grain, stocks or other commodities a written instrument setting forth the name and location of the exchange, board of trade or similar institution upon which such contract has been executed, the date of execution of the contract and the name and address of the persons with whom such contract was executed and if such person shall refuse or neglect to furnish such statement upon reasonable demand, such refusal or neglect shall be prima facie evidence that such contract was an illegal contract within the provisions of Section 4, of this act, and that the person who executed it was engaged in the maintenance and operation of a "bucket shop" within the provisions of Section 7, of this act.