New York § 363-DD Impairments of health; presumption

New York Statutes

§ 363-DD — Impairments of health; presumption

New York § 363-DD

Law RSSRetirement & Social Security

Title 8Death Benefits and Disability Retirement

Art. 8New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System

This text of New York § 363-DD (Impairments of health; presumption) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.Y. Retirement & Social Security § 363-DD (2026).

Text

  § 363-dd. Impairments of health; presumption. Notwithstanding any\nprovision of this chapter or of any general, special or local law to the\ncontrary, any police officer or firefighter who is covered by the\nprovisions of section three hundred sixty-three of this title and who\ncontracts HIV, tuberculosis or hepatitis after contact with members of\nthe public (where there may have been an exposure to a bodily fluid)\nwill be presumed to have contracted such disease in the performance or\ndischarge of his or her duties as the natural and proximate result of an\naccident and to be disabled from the performance of his or her duties\nunless the contrary be proven by competent evidence.\n

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

§ 363-dd. Impairments of health; presumption. Notwithstanding any\nprovision of this chapter or of any general, special or local law to the\ncontrary, any police officer or firefighter who is covered by the\nprovisions of section three hundred sixty-three of this title and who\ncontracts HIV, tuberculosis or hepatitis after contact with members of\nthe public (where there may have been an exposure to a bodily fluid)\nwill be presumed to have contracted such disease in the performance or\ndischarge of his or her duties as the natural and proximate result of an\naccident and to be disabled from the performance of his or her duties\nunless the contrary be proven by competent evidence.\n