New York Statutes
§ 404 — Objections in point of law
New York § 404
This text of New York § 404 (Objections in point of law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.Y. Civil Practice Law & Rules § 404 (2026).
Text
§ 404. Objections in point of law.
(a)By respondent. The respondent\nmay raise an objection in point of law by setting it forth in his answer\nor by a motion to dismiss the petition, made upon notice within the time\nallowed for answer. If the motion is denied, the court may permit the\nrespondent to answer, upon such terms as may be just; and unless the\norder specifies otherwise, such answer shall be served and filed within\nfive days after service of the order with notice of entry; and the\npetitioner may re-notice the matter for hearing upon two days' notice,\nor the respondent may re-notice the matter for hearing upon service of\nthe answer upon seven days' notice.\n (b) By petitioner. The petitioner may raise an objection in point of\nlaw to new matter contained in the answer by
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vasquez v. City of Newburgh
35 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People ex rel. Carroll v. Keyser
2020 NY Slip Op 3169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Leonia Bank v. Kouri
3 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People ex rel. Figueroa v. Keyser
2021 NY Slip Op 02035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
In re Foley
140 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
230 Tenants Corp. v. Board of Standards & Appeals
101 A.D.2d 53 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Lefkowitz v. Therapeutic Hypnosis, Inc.
52 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Arbitration between Propulsora Ixtapa Sur, S.A. De C.V. & Omni Hotels Franchising Corp.
211 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Lack v. Kreiner
91 A.D.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Langdon v. Mohr
67 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.
90 Misc. 2d 930 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Wildermuth v. Pious
21 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Matter of Lindo v. Ponte
2017 NY Slip Op 4282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Marafito v. McDonough
2017 NY Slip Op 6339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Davis v. Adirondack Industries, Inc.
33 A.D.2d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
In re New York State Urban Development Corp.
193 Misc. 2d 290 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Lev v. Lader
115 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Matter of CUCS HDFC v. Aymes
2021 NY Slip Op 00991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
40-40-40-38 78th St., LLC v. Murillo
72 Misc. 3d 127(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Katagas v. Berman
21 A.D.3d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 4001
Powers of referees§ 401
Parties§ 4011
Sequence of trial§ 4014
Duration of trial§ 4017
Objections§ 4018
Increased damages§ 402
PleadingsCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
New York § 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ny/CVP/404.