New York § 370 Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and reptiles

New York Statutes

§ 370 — Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and reptiles

New York § 370

Law AGMAgriculture & Markets

Art. 26Animals

This text of New York § 370 (Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and reptiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.Y. Agriculture & Markets § 370 (2026).

Text

  § 370. Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and\nreptiles. Any person owning, possessing or harboring a wild animal or\nreptile capable of inflicting bodily harm upon a human being, who shall\nfail to exercise due care in safeguarding the public from attack by such\nwild animal or reptile, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by\nimprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than\nfive hundred dollars, or by both. "Wild animal" within the meaning of\nthis section, shall not include a dog or cat or other domestic animal.\n  Previous attacks upon a human being by such wild animal or reptile, or\nknowledge of the vicious propensities of such wild animal or reptile, on\nthe part of the possessor or harborer thereof, shall not be required to\nbe proven by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

§ 370. Protection of the public from attack by wild animals and\nreptiles. Any person owning, possessing or harboring a wild animal or\nreptile capable of inflicting bodily harm upon a human being, who shall\nfail to exercise due care in safeguarding the public from attack by such\nwild animal or reptile, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by\nimprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than\nfive hundred dollars, or by both. "Wild animal" within the meaning of\nthis section, shall not include a dog or cat or other domestic animal.\n Previous attacks upon a human being by such wild animal or reptile, or\nknowledge of the vicious propensities of such wild animal or reptile, on\nthe part of the possessor or harborer thereof, shall not be required to\nbe proven by the people upon a prosecution hereunder; and neither the\nfact that such wild animal or reptile has not previously attacked a\nhuman being, nor lack of knowledge of the vicious propensities of such\nwild animal or reptile on the part of the owner, possessor or harborer\nthereof shall constitute a defense to a prosecution hereunder.\n