New York Statutes
§ 3107 — Notice of taking oral questions
New York § 3107
This text of New York § 3107 (Notice of taking oral questions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.Y. Civil Practice Law & Rules § 3107 (2026).
Text
Rule 3107. Notice of taking oral questions. A party desiring to take\nthe deposition of any person upon oral examination shall give to each\nparty twenty days' notice, unless the court orders otherwise. The notice\nshall be in writing, stating the time and place for taking the\ndeposition, the name and address of each person to be examined, if\nknown, and, if any name is not known, a general description sufficient\nto identify him or the particular class or group to which he belongs.\nThe notice need not enumerate the matters upon which the person is to be\nexamined. A party to be examined pursuant to notice served by another\nparty may serve notice of at least ten days for the examination of any\nother party, his agent or employee, such examination to be noticed for\nand to follow at th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ramos v. Rojas
37 A.D.3d 291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Tirado v. Miller
75 A.D.3d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Beiny
129 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Wiseman v. American Motors Sales Corp.
103 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Alouette Fashions, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
119 A.D.2d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Iseman v. Delmar Medical-Dental Building, Inc.
113 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Schneider v. Schneider
72 Misc. 2d 423 (NYC Family Court, 1972)
Mendelowitz v. Xerox Corp.
169 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
East Hampton Union Free School District v. Sandpebble Builders, Inc.
66 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Henriques v. Boitano
304 A.D.2d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Mayer v. Albany Medical Center Hospital
56 Misc. 2d 239 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
In re Beeman
108 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Muss v. Utilities & Industries Corp.
61 Misc. 2d 642 (New York Supreme Court, 1969)
Kurzman v. Burger
98 Misc. 2d 244 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Smith v. Robilotto
27 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Thompson v. Lincoln Budget Corp.
89 Misc. 2d 252 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
In re the Estate of Rothko
73 Misc. 2d 548 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1973)
Cavuoto v. Smith
108 Misc. 2d 221 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Hernandez v. Mueller
29 Misc. 3d 522 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Serio v. Rhulen
29 A.D.3d 1195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 3101
Scope of disclosure§ 3103
Protective ordersCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
New York § 3107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ny/3107.