Nevada Statutes

§ 38.219 — Validity of agreement to arbitrate

Nevada·Title 3 REMEDIES; SPECIAL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS·Ch. 38 Mediation· UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT OF 2000
1.An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable and irrevocable except as otherwise provided in NRS 597.995 or upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract.
2.The court shall decide whether an agreement to arbitrate exists or a controversy is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.
3.An arbitrator shall decide whether a condition precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled and whether a contract containing a valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.
4.If a party to a judicial proceeding challenges the existence of, or claims that a controversy is not subject to, an agreement to arbitrate, the arbitral proceeding may continue pendin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nevada § 38.219 (Validity of agreement to arbitrate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Home Corp. v. Michael Ballesteros Trust
415 P.3d 32 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2018)
52 case citations
Bank of America, N.A. v. Lee C/W 69306
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2017)
Desage Vs. Aw Fin. Grp., Llc
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2020)
Fat Hat, LLC v. Diterlizzi
(Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
King v. Robertson
(D. Nevada, 2022)
MIKA VS. DIST. CT. (CPS SECURITY (USA), INC.)
2015 NV 71 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2015)
PRINCIPAL INVESTMENTS, INC. VS. HARRISON
2016 NV 2 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2016)
TALLMAN VS. DIST. CT. (CPS SECURITY (USA), INC.)
2015 NV 71 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2015)
U.S. HOME CORP. VS. THE MICHAEL BALLESTEROS TRUST
2018 NV 25 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2018)

Legislative History

(Added to NRS by 2001, 1275 ; A 2013, 568 )

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗