§ 40:55D-123 — 3-year, six-year reviews; prevention of repeal

a. The development transfer ordinance shall be reviewed by the planning board and governing body of the municipality at the end of three years subsequent to enactment. This review shall include an analysis of development potential transactions in both the private and public market, an update of current conditions in comparison to the original report prepared pursuant to section 5 of this act, and an assessment of the performance goals of the development transfer program including an evaluation of the units constructed with and without the utilization of the development transfer ordinance. A report of findings from this review shall be submitted to the county planning board and, where the sending zone includes agricultural land, the CADB for review and recommendations. Based on this review the municipality shall act to maintain and enhance the value of development transfer potential not yet utilized and, if necessary, amend the infrastructure plan and comprehensive development plan and design standards prepared pursuant to section 5 of this act. b. The development transfer ordinance shall be reviewed by the planning board and governing body of the municipality at the end of six years subsequent to enactment. This review shall provide for the examination of the development transfer ordinance to determine whether the program for development transfer and the permitted uses in the sending zone continue to remain economically viable, and shall require an update of the report and plans prepared pursuant to section 5 of this act. If at least 30% of the development potential available on the market at market value has not been transferred at the end of this six-year period, the municipal governing body shall repeal the development transfer ordinance within 90 days of the end of the six-year period unless one of the following is met: (1) the municipality immediately takes action to acquire or provide for the private purchase of the difference between the development potential already transferred and 50% of the total development transfer potential created in the sending zone under the development transfer ordinance; (2) a majority of the property owners in a sending zone who own land from which the development potential has not yet been transferred agree that the development transfer ordinance should remain in effect; or (3) the municipality can demonstrate either future success or can demonstrate that low levels of development transfer activity is due not to ordinance failure but to low levels of development demand in general. This demonstration shall require the concurrence of the county planning board and the Office of State Planning, and shall be the subject of a municipal public hearing conducted prior to a final determination regarding the future viability of the development transfer program. c. Thereafter the development transfer ordinance shall provide for review thereof by the planning board and the governing body of the municipality at least once every six years in conjunction with the review and update of the master plan of the municipality pursuant to the provisions of section 76 of P.L.1975, c.291 (C.40:55D-89). This review shall provide for the examination of the ordinance to determine whether the program and uses permitted in the sending zone continue to be economically viable and shall require an update of the report and plans prepared pursuant to section 5 of this act. d. If 60% of the development potential has not been transferred at the end of a 12-year period, the municipal governing body shall repeal the development transfer ordinance within 90 days at the end of the 12-year period unless the municipality meets the standards established pursuant to subsection b. of this section. L.1989,c.86,s.11.