Nebraska Statutes

§ 75-362 — Federal regulations; terms, defined

Nebraska § 75-362
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 75Public Service Commission

This text of Nebraska § 75-362 (Federal regulations; terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-362 (2026).

Text

For purposes of sections 75-362 to 75-369.07 , unless the context otherwise requires:

(1)Accident means:
(a)Except as provided in subdivision (b) of this subdivision, an occurrence involving a commercial motor vehicle operating on a highway in interstate or intrastate commerce which results in:
(i)A fatality;
(ii)Bodily injury to a person who, as a result of the injury, immediately receives medical treatment away from the scene of the accident; or
(iii)One or more motor vehicles incurring disabling damage as a result of the accident, requiring the motor vehicles to be transported away from the scene by a tow truck or other motor vehicle.
(b)The term accident does not include:
(i)An occurrence involving only boarding and alighting from a stationary motor vehicle; or
(ii)An occurr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sparks v. M&D Trucking, L.L.C.
301 Neb. 977 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
43 case citations
Cruz v. Lopez
301 Neb. 531 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
McCartney v. Zurcher
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
Sparks v. M&D Trucking
301 Neb. 977 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 2006, LB 1007, § 14; Laws 2010, LB725, § 2; Laws 2010, LB805, § 12; Laws 2014, LB983, § 60; Laws 2016, LB311, § 23; Laws 2020, LB944, § 77. Annotations: Pursuant to subdivision (31) of this section, when distinguishing between a motor carrier and a broker, the determinative question is whether the disputed party accepted legal responsibility to transport the shipment. Sparks v. M&D Trucking, 301 Neb. 977, 921 N.W.2d 110 (2018). Even if the regulatory scheme governing intrastate motor carriers was applicable to common-law concepts of respondeat superior liability in a tort action, a general contractor that was a registered motor carrier, and that hired another registered motor carrier to transport construction debris, was not the statutory employer of the hired carrier or its truckdriver and, thus, could not be held vicariously liable to automobile passenger who was injured in a collision with the hired carrier's truck while the driver was under the influence of drugs; regulatory scheme contemplated a relationship between a registered motor carrier and a private truck owner or driver that was not a registered motor carrier, and did not impose an agency relationship when the independent contractor was also a registered motor carrier. Cruz v. Lopez, 301 Neb. 531, 919 N.W.2d 479 (2018). Under the plain language of "employee" and "employer," as used in the statutes governing intrastate motor carriers and adopting certain federal motor carrier safety regulations, a registered motor carrier that is also an employer of the drivers of its commercial motor vehicles cannot at the same time be the statutory employee of another motor carrier acting as a general contractor for a particular job. Cruz v. Lopez, 301 Neb. 531, 919 N.W.2d 479 (2018).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 75-362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/75-362.