Nebraska Statutes

§ 48-1102 — Terms, defined

Nebraska § 48-1102

This text of Nebraska § 48-1102 (Terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1102 (2026).

Text

For purposes of the Nebraska Fair Employment Practice Act, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1)Person shall include one or more individuals, labor unions, partnerships, limited liability companies, associations, corporations, legal representatives, mutual companies, joint-stock companies, trusts, unincorporated organizations, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers;
(2)Employer shall mean a person engaged in an industry who has fifteen or more employees for each working day in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year, any agent of such a person, and any party whose business is financed in whole or in part under the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Act regardless of the number of employees and shall include the State of Nebraska, go

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen C. Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
297 F.3d 720 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
120 case citations
Ryan v. Capital Contractors, Inc.
679 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
75 case citations
McPherson v. City of Scottsbluff
303 Neb. 765 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
32 case citations
Riggs v. County of Banner
159 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (D. Nebraska, 2001)
27 case citations
Patricia Davis v. J. Ricketts
765 F.3d 823 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
26 case citations
Frank Hohn v. BNSF Railway Company
707 F.3d 995 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
24 case citations
Meyer v. Lincoln Police Department
347 F. Supp. 2d 706 (D. Nebraska, 2004)
23 case citations
City of Fort Calhoun v. Collins
500 N.W.2d 822 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
22 case citations
IBP, Inc. v. Sands
563 N.W.2d 353 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
17 case citations
Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties
876 N.W.2d 372 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
9 case citations
Thompson v. City of Omaha
455 N.W.2d 538 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
9 case citations
McCamish v. Douglas County Hospital
466 N.W.2d 521 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
7 case citations
Fritz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
158 F. Supp. 2d 991 (D. Nebraska, 2001)
3 case citations
Tonya Huber v. Westar Foods, Inc.
106 F.4th 725 (Eighth Circuit, 2024)
3 case citations
Trimble v. BNSF Railway Co.
636 F. Supp. 2d 916 (D. Nebraska, 2009)
2 case citations
Father Flanagan's Boys' Home v. Goerke
401 N.W.2d 461 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
1 case citations
Beverly Woodyard v. Hoover Group, Inc.
985 F.2d 421 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
1 case citations
Bradley v. Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc.
926 F.2d 714 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
1 case citations
Adams v. Tenneco Automotive Operating Co., Inc.
358 F. Supp. 2d 878 (D. Nebraska, 2005)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1965, c. 276, § 2, p. 783; Laws 1967, c. 306, § 1, p. 829; Laws 1969, c. 120, § 21, p. 551; Laws 1973, LB 265, § 2; Laws 1973, LB 266, § 2; Laws 1977, LB 161, § 1; Laws 1979, LB 67, § 1; Laws 1983, LB 626, § 74; Laws 1984, LB 14A, § 1; Laws 1985, LB 324, § 1; Laws 1986, LB 1108, § 1; Laws 1989, LB 176, § 1; Laws 1993, LB 121, § 297; Laws 1993, LB 124, § 1; Laws 1993, LB 360, § 3; Laws 2004, LB 1083, § 98; Laws 2015, LB627, § 1; Laws 2021, LB451, § 1. Cross References: Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Act, see section 58-201. Uniform Controlled Substances Act, see section 28-401.01. Annotations: 1. Major life activities 2. Drug use 3. Miscellaneous 1. Major life activities Concentrating, thinking, and communicating are major life activities under subdivision (9) of this section. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 293 Neb. 91, 876 N.W.2d 372 (2016). Under subdivision (9) of this section, "major life activities" are those activities that are of central importance to daily life. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 293 Neb. 91, 876 N.W.2d 372 (2016). Under subdivision (9) of this section, to be substantially limited in the major life activity of working, the plaintiff must show that he or she was significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills, and abilities. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 293 Neb. 91, 876 N.W.2d 372 (2016). 2. Drug use Drug addiction is an impairment under subdivision (9) of this section, but it is not a disability unless it substantially limits a major life activity or is perceived by the employer to substantially limit a major life activity. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 293 Neb. 91, 876 N.W.2d 372 (2016). A qualified individual with a disability includes an individual who has been rehabilitated successfully or who is erroneously regarded as engaging in the illegal use of drugs. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 291 Neb. 264, 865 N.W.2d 343 (2015). 3. Miscellaneous To show that an employer regarded an employee as disabled under subdivision (9)(c) of this section, the employee must demonstrate either that (1) despite having no impairment at all, the employer mistakenly believed that the employee had an impairment that substantially limited one or more major life activities, or (2) the employee had a nonlimiting impairment that the employer mistakenly believed substantially limited one or more major life activities. Marshall v. EyeCare Specialties, 293 Neb. 91, 876 N.W.2d 372 (2016). The threshold fact of consequence in a disability discrimination action is whether the plaintiff is a qualified individual with a disability—i.e., one who can perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodations. Arens v. NEBCO, Inc., 291 Neb. 834, 870 N.W.2d 1 (2015). The payroll method, in which an employee is counted on a given day if he or she was on the payroll on that day, should be used to determine whether an entity has the requisite number of employees to qualify as an employer as defined in subsection (2) of this section. Bluff's Vision Clinic v. Krzyzanowski, 251 Neb. 116, 555 N.W.2d 556 (1996). Persons seeking relief under alleged violation of rights set out in section 48-1101 must be persons within the definitions set out in this section. Steier v. Crosier Fathers of Hastings, 242 Neb. 16, 492 N.W.2d 870 (1992). Epilepsy is included within the definition of "disability," but only if the epilepsy is unrelated to the person's ability to engage in a particular occupation. Father Flanagan's Boys' Home v. Goerke, 224 Neb. 731, 401 N.W.2d 461 (1987). These sections do not mandate the employment of firemen with visual defects which would affect their ability to engage in that occupation. McCrea v. Cunningham, 202 Neb. 638, 277 N.W.2d 52 (1979). For purposes of subsection (2) of this section, to determine whether a person is an "employer", a "payroll method" shall be used, whereby a week is counted if an employer has 15 employees on the payroll for that week, regardless of whether or not each employee worked each day of the week in question. Bluff's Vision Clinic v. Krzyzanowski, 4 Neb. App. 380, 543 N.W.2d 761 (1996).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 48-1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/48-1102.