Nebraska Statutes
§ 48-108 — Employer's liability; claim for legal services or disbursements; lien; how established; payment
Nebraska § 48-108
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 48Labor
This text of Nebraska § 48-108 (Employer's liability; claim for legal services or disbursements; lien; how established; payment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-108 (2026).
Text
No
claim or agreement for legal services or disbursements in support of any demand
made or suit brought under the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act shall be
an enforceable lien against the amounts to be paid as damages or compensation
or be valid or binding in any other respect, unless the same be approved in
writing by a judge
of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court. After such approval, if notice
in writing be given the defendant of such claim or agreement for legal services
and disbursements, the same shall be a lien against any amount thereafter
to be paid as damages or compensation. When the employee's compensation is
payable by the employer in periodical installments, the compensation court
shall fix, at the time of approval, the proportion of each installment to
be paid on acco
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Foster v. BryanLGH Medical Center East
725 N.W.2d 839 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2007)
Stueve v. Valmont Industries
761 N.W.2d 544 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2009)
Wells v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
707 N.W.2d 438 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2005)
Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental Plan
491 N.W.2d 356 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1992)
Kidd v. Winchell's Donut House & National Union Fire Insurance
465 N.W.2d 442 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Briggs v. State
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2015)
Ellenberger v. Charles Vrana & Sons Constr.
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2016)
Kaiman v. MERCY MIDLANDS MED. & DENTAL PLAN
491 N.W.2d 356 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1992)
St. John v. Gering Public Schools
302 Neb. 269 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1913, c. 198, § 8, p. 581; R.S.1913, § 3649; C.S.1922, § 3031; C.S.1929, § 48-108; R.S.1943, § 48-108; Laws 1974, LB 732, § 1; Laws 1975, LB 187, § 1; Laws 1978, LB 649, § 1; Laws 1986, LB 811, § 27; Laws 2010, LB908, § 1.
Annotations: The Workers' Compensation Court has jurisdiction to determine a fee dispute arising out of an attorney's lien perfected pursuant to this section, regardless of whether the attorney seeking enforcement had previously been discharged. Foster v. BryanLGH Med. Ctr. East, 272 Neb. 918, 725 N.W.2d 839 (2007). Attorney's fees allowed by court were ordered applied on agreement entered into under this section. Miller v. Schlereth, 152 Neb. 805, 42 N.W.2d 865 (1950). Fees for plaintiff's attorneys allowed and taxed as costs are the property of the attorneys for whose benefit they are taxed. Approval by trial judge is a nonjudicial act and no notice thereof to claimant is required. Solomon v. A. W. Farney, Inc., 136 Neb. 338, 286 N.W. 254 (1939). Notice to compensation claimant is not condition precedent to approval of attorney's fees by trial judge. Arner v. Sioux County, 116 Neb. 394, 217 N.W. 603 (1928). This section limits amounts attorney may lawfully charge and is constitutional as proper exercise of police power. Agreement for fees that is not approved is not enforceable. Dysart v. Yeiser, 110 Neb. 65, 192 N.W. 953 (1923). The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether a health care insurer or HMO is obligated to share in the cost of obtaining reimbursement when the injured worker successfully asserts a claim for workers' compensation benefits. The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court's regulation of attorney fees and disbursement matters is limited to those which arise between the injured worker and the attorney representing the injured worker. Kaiman v. Mercy Midlands Medical & Dental Plan, 1 Neb. App. 148, 491 N.W.2d 356 (1992). Limiting fees of attorneys under Workmen's Compensation Act is not unconstitutional as depriving of liberty of contract without due process. Yeiser v. Dysart, 267 U.S. 540 (1925).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 48-108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/48-108.