Nebraska Statutes
§ 29-2266 — Probation; terms, defined
Nebraska § 29-2266
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 29-2266 (Probation; terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2266 (2026).
Text
For purposes of sections 29-2266.01 to 29-2266.03 :
(1)Absconding supervision means a probationer has purposely avoided supervision for a period of at least two weeks and reasonable efforts by probation officers and staff to locate the probationer in person have proven unsuccessful;
(2)Administrative sanction means an additional probation requirement imposed upon a probationer by his or her probation officer, with the full knowledge and consent of the probationer, designed to hold the probationer accountable for violations of conditions of probation, including, but not limited to:
(a)Counseling or reprimand by his or her probation officer;
(b)Increased supervision contact requirements;
(c)Increased substance abuse testing;
(d)Referral for substance abuse or mental health evaluatio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Painter
394 N.W.2d 292 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Jedlicka
305 Neb. 52 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
Kartman v. Parratt
397 F. Supp. 531 (D. Nebraska, 1975)
Opinion No. (1997)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1997)
State v. McManus
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1971, LB 680, § 21; Laws 2003, LB 46, § 11; Laws 2015, LB605, § 69; Laws 2016, LB1094, § 19.
Annotations: Where a complete record of the evidence and testimony is made at a probation revocation hearing, the court is not required to specify which particular evidence, exhibits, or witnesses were relied on for its judgment. State v. Jaworski, 194 Neb. 645, 234 N.W.2d 221 (1975). A written report from the probation officer is not a jurisdictional requirement in a probation revocation proceeding. State v. Kartman, 192 Neb. 803, 224 N.W.2d 753 (1975). Where errors in state probation revocation proceedings were not prejudicial to the probationer, he was not entitled to federal habeas corpus. Kartman v. Parratt, 397 F.Supp. 531 (D. Neb. 1975).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 29-1001
Prisoner; where confined§ 29-1002
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1003
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1004
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1005
Repealed. Laws 1998, LB 695, § 10§ 29-1006
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 829, § 3§ 29-101
Terms, usage§ 29-103
Magistrate, defined§ 29-104
Prosecuting attorney, defined§ 29-108
Signature, how construedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-2266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-2266.