Nebraska Statutes

§ 29-2266 — Probation; terms, defined

Nebraska § 29-2266
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 29Criminal Procedure

This text of Nebraska § 29-2266 (Probation; terms, defined) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2266 (2026).

Text

For purposes of sections 29-2266.01 to 29-2266.03 :

(1)Absconding supervision means a probationer has purposely avoided supervision for a period of at least two weeks and reasonable efforts by probation officers and staff to locate the probationer in person have proven unsuccessful;
(2)Administrative sanction means an additional probation requirement imposed upon a probationer by his or her probation officer, with the full knowledge and consent of the probationer, designed to hold the probationer accountable for violations of conditions of probation, including, but not limited to:
(a)Counseling or reprimand by his or her probation officer;
(b)Increased supervision contact requirements;
(c)Increased substance abuse testing;
(d)Referral for substance abuse or mental health evaluatio

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Painter
394 N.W.2d 292 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
42 case citations
State v. Jedlicka
305 Neb. 52 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
19 case citations
Kartman v. Parratt
397 F. Supp. 531 (D. Nebraska, 1975)
7 case citations
Opinion No. (1997)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1997)
State v. McManus
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2025)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1971, LB 680, § 21; Laws 2003, LB 46, § 11; Laws 2015, LB605, § 69; Laws 2016, LB1094, § 19. Annotations: Where a complete record of the evidence and testimony is made at a probation revocation hearing, the court is not required to specify which particular evidence, exhibits, or witnesses were relied on for its judgment. State v. Jaworski, 194 Neb. 645, 234 N.W.2d 221 (1975). A written report from the probation officer is not a jurisdictional requirement in a probation revocation proceeding. State v. Kartman, 192 Neb. 803, 224 N.W.2d 753 (1975). Where errors in state probation revocation proceedings were not prejudicial to the probationer, he was not entitled to federal habeas corpus. Kartman v. Parratt, 397 F.Supp. 531 (D. Neb. 1975).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 29-2266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/29-2266.