Nebraska Statutes

§ 28-511 — Theft by unlawful taking or disposition

Nebraska § 28-511
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 28Crimes and Punishments

This text of Nebraska § 28-511 (Theft by unlawful taking or disposition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-511 (2026).

Text

(1)A person is guilty of theft if he or she takes, or exercises control over, movable property of another with the intent to deprive him or her thereof.
(2)A person is guilty of theft if he or she transfers immovable property of another or any interest therein with the intent to benefit himself or herself or another not entitled thereto.
(3)Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, it shall be presumed that a lessee's failure to return leased or rented movable property to the lessor after the expiration of a written lease or written rental agreement is done with intent to deprive if such lessee has been mailed notice by certified mail that such lease or rental agreement has expired and he or she has failed within ten days after such notice to return such property.
(4)A pers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gartner
638 N.W.2d 849 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
145 case citations
State v. Copple
401 N.W.2d 141 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
120 case citations
State v. Juhl
449 N.W.2d 202 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
76 case citations
State v. Culver
444 N.W.2d 662 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
70 case citations
State v. Fahlk
524 N.W.2d 39 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1994)
67 case citations
State v. Campbell
473 N.W.2d 420 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
62 case citations
State v. Duncan
882 N.W.2d 650 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
61 case citations
State v. Krutilek
573 N.W.2d 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
46 case citations
State v. Kennedy
476 N.W.2d 810 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
45 case citations
State v. Beck
325 N.W.2d 148 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
39 case citations
Riggs v. County of Banner
159 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (D. Nebraska, 2001)
27 case citations
State v. Graham
492 N.W.2d 845 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
21 case citations
State v. Ballew
291 Neb. 577 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
19 case citations
State v. Blue Bird
440 N.W.2d 474 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
15 case citations
State v. Hilpert
330 N.W.2d 729 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
15 case citations
State v. Loveless
451 N.W.2d 692 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
14 case citations
State v. Jonusas
694 N.W.2d 651 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2005)
13 case citations
State v. Beyer
352 N.W.2d 168 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
11 case citations
State v. Brown
317 Neb. 273 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
11 case citations
State v. Kitt
434 N.W.2d 543 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
9 case citations

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1977, LB 38, § 110; Laws 1980, LB 696, § 4; Laws 1988, LB 606, § 1. Annotations: Read in conjunction with section 28-510, theft by unlawful taking under this section is the same offense as theft by receiving stolen property under section 28-517. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007). The Nebraska Legislature has unambiguously defined theft as a single offense which can be committed in several different ways. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007). Sufficient evidence was presented to support a conviction of theft by unlawful taking or disposition where the defendant, who was contractually obligated to place money in escrow, did not place the money in escrow and subsequently lost the money through an investment. State v. Jonusas, 269 Neb. 644, 694 N.W.2d 651 (2005). Subsection (1) of this section proscribes or condemns only that conduct in which criminal intent is present, distinguishing theft from activity which is otherwise permissible as noncriminal conduct. Consent is a valid defense to a charge of theft by taking. State v. Fahlk, 246 Neb. 834, 524 N.W.2d 39 (1994). A series of separate acts, each of which is a theft proscribed by subsection (2) of this section, does not constitute one criminal act or a continuing offense of theft. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). Neither the value of the property stolen nor the time at which it was appropriated are essential elements of the crime of theft. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). Under subsection (2) of this section, the elements of theft by unlawful disposition are (1) a person's unauthorized transfer of another's immovable property (2) with the intent to benefit himself, herself, or another not entitled to the property or any interest in the property. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). The value of the property stolen is no longer an element of the crime and is important only in determining the penalty. State v. Culver, 233 Neb. 228, 444 N.W.2d 662 (1989). When a person found guilty of a substantive crime as well as being a habitual criminal is improperly sentenced, both sentences must be set aside and the case remanded for proper sentencing. State v. Rolling, 209 Neb. 243, 307 N.W.2d 123 (1981).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 28-511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/28-511.