Nebraska Statutes
§ 28-511 — Theft by unlawful taking or disposition
Nebraska § 28-511
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 28Crimes and Punishments
This text of Nebraska § 28-511 (Theft by unlawful taking or disposition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-511 (2026).
Text
(1)A person is guilty of theft if he or she takes, or exercises control over, movable property of another with the intent to deprive him or her thereof.
(2)A person is guilty of theft if he or she transfers immovable property of another or any interest therein with the intent to benefit himself or herself or another not entitled thereto.
(3)Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, it shall be presumed that a lessee's failure to return leased or rented movable property to the lessor after the expiration of a written lease or written rental agreement is done with intent to deprive if such lessee has been mailed notice by certified mail that such lease or rental agreement has expired and he or she has failed within ten days after such notice to return such property.
(4)A pers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Gartner
638 N.W.2d 849 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Copple
401 N.W.2d 141 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Juhl
449 N.W.2d 202 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Culver
444 N.W.2d 662 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Fahlk
524 N.W.2d 39 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Campbell
473 N.W.2d 420 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Duncan
882 N.W.2d 650 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Krutilek
573 N.W.2d 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Kennedy
476 N.W.2d 810 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Beck
325 N.W.2d 148 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
Riggs v. County of Banner
159 F. Supp. 2d 1158 (D. Nebraska, 2001)
State v. Graham
492 N.W.2d 845 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Ballew
291 Neb. 577 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Blue Bird
440 N.W.2d 474 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Hilpert
330 N.W.2d 729 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Loveless
451 N.W.2d 692 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Jonusas
694 N.W.2d 651 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Beyer
352 N.W.2d 168 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Brown
317 Neb. 273 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Kitt
434 N.W.2d 543 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1977, LB 38, § 110; Laws 1980, LB 696, § 4; Laws 1988, LB 606, § 1.
Annotations: Read in conjunction with section 28-510, theft by unlawful taking under this section is the same offense as theft by receiving stolen property under section 28-517. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007). The Nebraska Legislature has unambiguously defined theft as a single offense which can be committed in several different ways. State v. Miner, 273 Neb. 837, 733 N.W.2d 891 (2007). Sufficient evidence was presented to support a conviction of theft by unlawful taking or disposition where the defendant, who was contractually obligated to place money in escrow, did not place the money in escrow and subsequently lost the money through an investment. State v. Jonusas, 269 Neb. 644, 694 N.W.2d 651 (2005). Subsection (1) of this section proscribes or condemns only that conduct in which criminal intent is present, distinguishing theft from activity which is otherwise permissible as noncriminal conduct. Consent is a valid defense to a charge of theft by taking. State v. Fahlk, 246 Neb. 834, 524 N.W.2d 39 (1994). A series of separate acts, each of which is a theft proscribed by subsection (2) of this section, does not constitute one criminal act or a continuing offense of theft. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). Neither the value of the property stolen nor the time at which it was appropriated are essential elements of the crime of theft. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). Under subsection (2) of this section, the elements of theft by unlawful disposition are (1) a person's unauthorized transfer of another's immovable property (2) with the intent to benefit himself, herself, or another not entitled to the property or any interest in the property. State v. Schaaf, 234 Neb. 144, 449 N.W.2d 762 (1989). The value of the property stolen is no longer an element of the crime and is important only in determining the penalty. State v. Culver, 233 Neb. 228, 444 N.W.2d 662 (1989). When a person found guilty of a substantive crime as well as being a habitual criminal is improperly sentenced, both sentences must be set aside and the case remanded for proper sentencing. State v. Rolling, 209 Neb. 243, 307 N.W.2d 123 (1981).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1001
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1002
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1003
Transferred to section28-1010§ 28-1004
Terms, defined§ 28-1007
Sections, how
construed§ 28-1008
Terms, defined§ 28-1009.02
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-1009.03
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-101
Code, how cited§ 28-1010
Indecency with
an animal; penaltyCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 28-511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/28-511.