Nebraska Statutes
§ 28-202 — Conspiracy, defined; penalty
Nebraska § 28-202
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 28Crimes and Punishments
This text of Nebraska § 28-202 (Conspiracy, defined; penalty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-202 (2026).
Text
(1)A person shall be guilty of criminal conspiracy if, with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of a felony:
(a)He agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them shall engage in or solicit the conduct or shall cause or solicit the result specified by the definition of the offense; and
(b)He or another person with whom he conspired commits an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy.
(2)If a person knows that one with whom he conspires to commit a crime has conspired with another person or persons to commit the same crime, he is guilty of conspiring to commit such crime with such other person or persons whether or not he knows their identity.
(3)If a person conspires to commit a number of crimes, he is guilty of only one conspiracy so long as such multiple
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Henry
875 N.W.2d 374 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Betancourt-Garcia
887 N.W.2d 296 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Copple
401 N.W.2d 141 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Manchester
331 N.W.2d 776 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Edwards
837 N.W.2d 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
State v. Heitman
629 N.W.2d 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Theisen
306 Neb. 591 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Lafler
405 N.W.2d 576 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Strohl
587 N.W.2d 675 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Cortis
465 N.W.2d 132 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Null
526 N.W.2d 220 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
State v. Miller
315 Neb. 951 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Clason
526 N.W.2d 673 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1994)
State v. Stott
503 N.W.2d 822 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Russell
292 Neb. 501 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. John
328 N.W.2d 181 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
State v. Boswell
316 Neb. 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Canaday
641 N.W.2d 13 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Estrada Comacho
309 Neb. 494 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Schmidt
327 N.W.2d 624 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1977, LB 38, § 11; Laws 2015, LB268, § 8; Referendum 2016, No. 426. Note: The changes made to section 28-202 by Laws 2015, LB 268, section 8, have been omitted because of the vote on the referendum at the November 2016 general election.
Annotations: Pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, a conviction requires only that an agreement for the commission of a criminal act was entered into and an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy was committed. State v. Theisen, 306 Neb. 591, 946 N.W.2d 677 (2020). In enacting this section, the Legislature adopted the unilateral approach to the agreement element of conspiracy as found in the Model Penal Code. State v. Heitman, 262 Neb. 185, 629 N.W.2d 542 (2001). A conviction under this section requires proof of an overt act, but not successful commission of a felony. State v. Null, 247 Neb. 192, 526 N.W.2d 220 (1995). Because Nebraska adheres to the unilateral approach to the crime of conspiracy, the fact that none of the "coconspirators" at any time planned to follow through with the plan has no impact on the culpability of the defendant. State v. Knight, 239 Neb. 958, 479 N.W.2d 792 (1992). Conspiracy requires the proof of an overt act which tends to show a preexisting conspiracy and manifests an intent or design toward accomplishment of a crime. State v. Anderson, 229 Neb. 436, 427 N.W.2d 770 (1988); State v. Anderson, 229 Neb. 427, 427 N.W.2d 764 (1988). Circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to establish the existence of a conspiracy or the criminal intent necessary for conspiracy. State v. Anderson, 229 Neb. 427, 427 N.W.2d 764 (1988). An "overt act" is an act which tends to show a preexisting conspiracy and manifests an intent or design toward accomplishment of a crime, but need not itself have the capacity to accomplish the conspiratorial objective and need not itself be a criminal act. State v. Copple, 224 Neb. 672, 401 N.W.2d 141 (1987). A person may be convicted of a conspiracy to solicit the commission of murder even though the person with whom he conspired feigned agreement and at no time intended to go through with the plan. An overt act is an act done in pursuance of the conspiracy and manifests an intent or design looking toward accomplishing the crime. The act need not have a tendency to accomplish the object of the conspiracy, nor be criminal in itself. State v. John, 213 Neb. 76, 328 N.W.2d 181 (1982). The Wharton Rule exception to establishing conspiracy does not apply to offenses that can be committed by one person, or if more or different people participate in the conspiracy than are necessary to commit the substantive offense, or when the substantive offense has not yet been committed by any of the conspirators. State v. Clason, 3 Neb. App. 339, 526 N.W.2d 673 (1994).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 28-1001
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1002
Repealed. Laws 1990, LB 50, § 13§ 28-1003
Transferred to section28-1010§ 28-1004
Terms, defined§ 28-1007
Sections, how
construed§ 28-1008
Terms, defined§ 28-1009.02
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-1009.03
Repealed. Laws 2010, LB 865, § 17§ 28-101
Code, how cited§ 28-1010
Indecency with
an animal; penaltyCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 28-202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/28-202.