Nebraska Statutes
§ 25-1056 — Garnishment in aid of execution; when issued; procedure; continuing lien; when invalid; priority; financial institution; service of process; designated location; Department of Banking and Finance; immunity
Nebraska § 25-1056
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 25Courts; Civil Procedure
This text of Nebraska § 25-1056 (Garnishment in aid of execution; when issued; procedure; continuing lien; when invalid; priority; financial institution; service of process; designated location; Department of Banking and Finance; immunity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1056 (2026).
Text
(1)In all cases when a judgment has been entered by any court of record and the judgment creditor or his or her agent or attorney has filed an affidavit setting forth the amount due on the judgment, interest, and costs in the office of the clerk of the court where the judgment has been entered and that he or she has good reason to and does believe that any person, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, naming him, her, or it, has property of and is indebted to the judgment debtor, the clerk shall issue a summons which shall set forth the amount due on the judgment, interest, and costs as shown in the affidavit and require such person, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, as garnishee, to answer written interrogatories to be furnished by the plaintiff an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cattle Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Watson
880 N.W.2d 906 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
Strunk v. Chromy-Strunk
708 N.W.2d 821 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
Shawn E. ex rel. Grace E. v. Diane S.
912 N.W.2d 920 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. Wolfe
647 N.W.2d 615 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2002)
Novak v. Novak
513 N.W.2d 303 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1994)
Darr v. Long
313 N.W.2d 215 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
Davis Erection Co., Inc. v. Jorgensen
534 N.W.2d 746 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
Novak v. Novak
508 N.W.2d 283 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
Bowers v. Dougherty
615 N.W.2d 449 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
Myers v. Christensen
776 N.W.2d 201 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2009)
ML Manager v. Jensen
287 Neb. 171 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014)
SCHMUECKER BROS. IMPLEMENT CO. v. Sobotka
348 N.W.2d 130 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Kropf v. Kropf
538 N.W.2d 496 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1995)
Brandon Pierce v. Collection Associates, Inc.
779 F.3d 814 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
Overland National Bank of Grand Island v. Olson (In Re Olson)
101 B.R. 134 (D. Nebraska, 1989)
J.K. v. Kolbeck
595 N.W.2d 875 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1999)
United Seeds, Inc. v. Eagle Green Corp.
389 N.W.2d 571 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Freis v. Harvey
563 N.W.2d 363 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
Shawn E. on behalf of Grace E. v. Diane S.
300 Neb. 289 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Fox v. Whitbeck
783 N.W.2d 774 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2010)
Legislative History
Source: R.S.1867, Code § 244, p. 433; R.S.1913, § 7785; C.S.1922, § 8729; C.S.1929, § 20-1056; R.S.1943, § 25-1056; Laws 1953, c. 68, § 1, p. 219; Laws 1955, c. 85, § 3, p. 255; Laws 1959, c. 101, § 4, p. 423; Laws 1972, LB 1032, § 127; Laws 1974, LB 737, § 1; Laws 1980, LB 597, § 15; Laws 1988, LB 1030, § 17; Laws 1993, LB 121, § 169; Laws 1995, LB 420, § 1; Laws 1996, LB 1048, § 1; Laws 1997, LB 771, § 1; Laws 2015, LB195, § 2; Laws 2025, LB150, § 22. Operative Date: September 3, 2025
Annotations: 1. Affidavit 2. Summons 3. Proceedings 4. When section is not applicable 5. Miscellaneous 1. Affidavit Affidavit upon mere belief is sufficient. Clarke v. Neb. Nat. Bank, 57 Neb. 314, 77 N.W. 805 (1899). Affidavit purporting not to be that of an individual is void; fact of agency should be sworn to. Jeary v. American Exchange Bank, 2 Neb. Unof. 657, 89 N.W. 771 (1902). 2. Summons Acknowledgment on back of summons is equivalent to service. Scott v. McDonald, 125 Neb. 803, 252 N.W. 323 (1934). After judgment, summons in garnishment from one county to another in aid of execution is unauthorized. Hinds State Bank v. Loffler, 113 Neb. 110, 202 N.W. 465 (1925). Where summons is issued same day execution is returned, it will be presumed latter was returned first. Brunke v. Gruben, 84 Neb. 806, 122 N.W. 37 (1909). If summons is issued before judgment, proceedings are void. Whitcomb v. Atkins, 40 Neb. 549, 59 N.W. 86 (1894). Return of officer "nulla bona" is conclusive for purposes of garnishment. Wilson v. Burney, 8 Neb. 39 (1878). 3. Proceedings Garnishment requires a judgment, and the dismissal of a suit pursuant to a settlement agreement does not suffice to allow a garnishment action to enforce the settlement. J.K. v. Kolbeck, 257 Neb. 107, 595 N.W.2d 875 (1999). Procedure for garnishment after domestic judgment and procedure for enforcement of foreign judgment compared. Sullivan v. Sullivan, 168 Neb. 850, 97 N.W.2d 348 (1959). Where garnishee denies indebtedness by answer and interrogatories are not propounded, garnishee should be discharged. Searcey v. Badgett, 137 Neb. 185, 288 N.W. 537 (1939). In a garnishment proceeding in aid of execution, the answer and evidence of garnishee only are admissible in response to the summons in garnishment. Orchard & Wilhelm Co. v. North, 135 Neb. 39, 280 N.W. 272 (1938). Law of garnishment is purely statutory and will be interpreted more strongly against garnishor. Central Market v. King, 132 Neb. 380, 272 N.W. 244 (1937). In garnishment proceedings in aid of execution the answer or evidence of the garnishee only may be taken by the court. Orchard & Wilhelm Co. v. North, 125 Neb. 723, 251 N.W. 895 (1933). If judgment is afterwards set aside, garnishment proceedings are dissolved. Clough v. Buck, 6 Neb. 343 (1877). This section authorizes garnishments in aid of execution and, by incorporating other statutes, expressly authorizes assertion in garnishment proceedings of exemptions applicable to executions. ARL Credit Servs. v. Piper, 15 Neb. App. 811, 736 N.W.2d 771 (2007). 4. When section is not applicable A garnishee bank waives its right of setoff if after notice of garnishment it permits the depositor to draw on the garnished account, reducing the account balance below the balance at the time of service or, if that balance is greater than the amount of judgment, below the amount of the judgment. United Seeds v. Eagle Green Corp., 223 Neb. 360, 389 N.W.2d 571 (1986). This section not applicable when garnishee is a foreign insurance company which has complied with statutory provisions to obtain certificate of authority to do business. Pupkes v. Sailors, 183 Neb. 784, 164 N.W.2d 441 (1969). 5. Miscellaneous The Employee Retirement Income Security Act's anti-alienation statute bars creditors from collecting undistributed funds in a judgment debtor's employee benefit plan through postjudgment garnishment in aid of execution proceedings. Florence Lake Investments v. Berg, 312 Neb. 183, 978 N.W.2d 308 (2022). Garnishment in aid of execution of a judgment is proper in Nebraska only when the garnishee has property of and is indebted to the judgment debtor, and the test for determining the liability of the garnishee defendant to the garnisheeing plaintiff is whether or not the facts would support a recovery by the principal defendant against the garnishee. Darr v. Long, 210 Neb. 57, 313 N.W.2d 215 (1988). Judgment creditor of insolvent corporation cannot put himself in preferred position over other creditors. State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank of Omaha, 136 Neb. 880, 287 N.W. 762 (1939). A judicial order on a garnishee to turn over money or property in aid of execution can only be made upon an unqualified admission by him of a present indebtedness which execution debtor would be entitled to but for the garnishment. Shonsey Co. v. Belgrade-Hord Co., 133 Neb. 886, 277 N.W. 597 (1938); Early v. Belgrade-Hord Co., 133 Neb. 884, 277 N.W. 596 (1938). Indebtedness of maker upon promissory note, before maturity, is not the subject of attachment; his obligation is not to payee but to holder, whoever he may be. Fisher v. O'Hanlon, 93 Neb. 529, 141 N.W. 157 (1913).
Nearby Sections
15
§ 25-1001
Attachment; grounds§ 25-1006
Attachment; order; return day§ 25-101
Civil action§ 25-1012
Repealed. Laws 1980, LB 597, § 18§ 25-1012.01
Garnishment; public officers and employeesCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 25-1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/25-1056.