Nebraska Statutes

§ 14-102 — Additional powers

Nebraska § 14-102
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 14Cities of the Metropolitan Class

This text of Nebraska § 14-102 (Additional powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-102 (2026).

Text

In addition to the powers granted in section 14-101 , cities of the metropolitan class shall have power by ordinance:

(1)To levy any tax or special assessment authorized by law;
(2)To provide a corporate seal for the use of the city, and also any official seal for the use of any officer, board, or agent of the city, whose duties require an official seal to be used. Such corporate seal shall be used in the execution of municipal bonds, warrants, conveyances, and other instruments and proceedings as required by law;
(3)To provide all needful rules and regulations for the protection and preservation of health within the city, including providing for the enforcement of the use of water from public water supplies when the use of water from other sources shall be deemed unsafe;
(4)To approp

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giger v. City of Omaha
442 N.W.2d 182 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
76 case citations
Bronsen v. Dawes County
722 N.W.2d 17 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2006)
59 case citations
Malone v. City of Omaha
883 N.W.2d 320 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2016)
53 case citations
McNally v. City of Omaha
731 N.W.2d 573 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2007)
36 case citations
Professional Firefighters of Omaha, Local 385 v. City of Omaha
498 N.W.2d 325 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
26 case citations
Hroch v. City of Omaha
413 N.W.2d 287 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
12 case citations
Nikolas v. City of Omaha
605 F.3d 539 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
12 case citations
Omaha Fish & Wildlife Club, Inc. v. Community Refuse Disposal, Inc.
329 N.W.2d 335 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
8 case citations
State v. Salisbury
579 N.W.2d 570 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
5 case citations
Hartford v. Womens Services, P.C.
477 N.W.2d 161 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
2 case citations
Jasa v. City of Omaha
352 N.W.2d 913 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
2 case citations
Glup v. City of Omaha ex rel. Cottage
383 N.W.2d 773 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
1 case citations
Glup v. CITY OF OMAHA THROUGH COTTAGE
383 N.W.2d 773 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Opinion No. (1981)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1981)
Opinion No. (2009)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 2009)
Opinion No. (2010)
(Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 2010)

Legislative History

Source: Laws 1921, c. 116, art. I, § 2, p. 398; C.S.1922, § 3489; C.S.1929, § 14-102; R.S.1943, § 14-102; Laws 1963, c. 314, § 1, p. 945; Laws 1971, LB 237, § 1; Laws 1972, LB 1274, § 1; Laws 1974, LB 768, § 1; Laws 1981, LB 501, § 1; Laws 1986, LB 1027, § 186; Laws 1991, LB 356, § 1; Laws 1991, LB 849, § 59; Laws 1992, LB 1257, § 63; Laws 1993, LB 138, § 61; Laws 1993, LB 623, § 1; Laws 1997, LB 814, § 2; Laws 1999, LB 87, § 59; Laws 2008, LB806, § 1; Laws 2009, LB430, § 1; Laws 2009, LB503, § 11; Laws 2015, LB266, § 1; Laws 2022, LB800, § 9; Laws 2023, LB77, § 2. Cross References: Interlocal Cooperation Act, see section 13-801. Joint Public Agency Act, see section 13-2501. Nebraska Bingo Act, see section 9-201. Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act, see section 9-401. Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, see section 9-301. Nebraska Shooting Range Protection Act, see section 37-1301. Nebraska Small Lottery and Raffle Act, see section 9-501. State Lottery Act, see section 9-801. Annotations: 1. Use of streets 2. Health and safety 3. Occupations 4. Miscellaneous 1. Use of streets This section does not deprive the State Railway Commission of jurisdiction over the regulation of taxicabs in a metropolitan city. In re Yellow Cab & Baggage Company, 126 Neb. 138, 253 N.W. 80 (1934). A metropolitan city may impose a tax for use of streets upon a "rolling store" as a means of regulating transportation through its streets. Erwin v. City of Omaha, 118 Neb. 331, 224 N.W. 692 (1929). City has authority to regulate the use of autobuses upon its streets. Omaha & C. B. Street Ry. Co. v. City of Omaha, 114 Neb. 483, 208 N.W. 123 (1926). City cannot authorize construction in a public street of a canopy that deprives abutting property owner of light, air or view. World Realty Co. v. City of Omaha, 113 Neb. 396, 203 N.W. 574 (1925). City may regulate housemoving upon its streets, and can compel street railway to pay expense of removal of wires so houses can be moved. State ex rel. Barnum v. Omaha & C. B. Street Ry. Co., 100 Neb. 716, 161 N.W. 170 (1916). An ordinance prohibiting distribution of dodgers, handbills or circulars upon streets, alleys or sidewalks or public grounds of the city does not violate state Constitution. In re Anderson, 69 Neb. 686, 96 N.W. 149 (1903). City could not prohibit transportation of munitions by interstate motor carrier. Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. City of Omaha, 132 F. Supp. 6 (D. Neb. 1955). 2. Health and safety City is authorized to provide for detention of persons infected with communicable venereal disease. Brown v. Manning, 103 Neb. 540, 172 N.W. 522 (1919). City cannot arbitrarily classify ashes, manure, or other rubbish having some value as garbage, and grant an exclusive contract for removal. Iler v. Ross, 64 Neb. 710, 90 N.W. 869 (1902). Authority is conferred to license and regulate the production and sale of milk within the corporate limits, and a reasonable license fee may be exacted. Littlefield v. State, 42 Neb. 223, 60 N.W. 724 (1894). City can make exclusive contract with party for removing garbage and other noxious and unwholesome matter amounting to nuisances. Smiley v. MacDonald, 42 Neb. 5, 60 N.W. 355 (1894). 3. Occupations Metropolitan city was authorized to enact ordinance prohibiting sale or exchange of motor vehicles and keeping open a place of business for that purpose on Sunday. Stewart Motor Co. v. City of Omaha, 120 Neb. 776, 235 N.W. 332 (1931). City ordinance requiring closing grocery and meat markets on Sunday is valid. State v. Somberg, 113 Neb. 761, 204 N.W. 788 (1925). 4. Miscellaneous Under section 14-101 and this section, a city of the metropolitan class has the power to provide firefighting services to an airport authority. Professional Firefighters of Omaha v. City of Omaha, 243 Neb. 166, 498 N.W.2d 325 (1993). Public officials of cities of the metropolitan class are vested with the power to provide for keeping sidewalks clean and free from obstructions and accumulation. Hartford v. Womens Services, P.C., 239 Neb. 540, 477 N.W.2d 161 (1991). Under subsection (25) of this section, zoning ordinances enacted by a city, as a lawful exercise of police power, must be consistent with public health, safety, morals, and the general welfare. Giger v. City of Omaha, 232 Neb. 676, 442 N.W.2d 182 (1989). Ordinance regulating advertising signs held not unreasonable or discriminatory. Schaffer v. City of Omaha, 197 Neb. 328, 248 N.W.2d 764 (1977). This section discussed in connection with expenditure of municipal or county funds, for public purpose, through private agency. Chase v. County of Douglas, 195 Neb. 838, 241 N.W.2d 334 (1976). City empowered hereunder to require bonds of police officers, and recovery may be had thereon by persons injured as result of negligent acts of policeman in discharge of municipal duties, although bond runs to city as obligee. Curnyn v. Kinney, 119 Neb. 478, 229 N.W. 894 (1930). Mayor and city council are given ample power to make and enforce regulations for the good government, general welfare, health, safety, and security of the city and citizens thereof. State ex rel. Thompson v. Donahue, 91 Neb. 311, 135 N.W. 1030 (1912). Metropolitan city may enact ordinance forbidding construction of brick kilns within city. State ex rel. Krittenbrink v. Withnell, 91 Neb. 101, 135 N.W. 376 (1912), 40 L.R.A.N.S. 898 (1912). City is not liable in negligence action on account of original construction of viaduct where plan designed by competent engineers was carried out. Watters v. City of Omaha, 86 Neb. 722, 126 N.W. 308 (1910); Watters v. City of Omaha, 76 Neb. 855, 107 N.W. 1007 (1906), affirmed on rehearing, 76 Neb. 859, 110 N.W. 981 (1907). Power to establish fire-engine houses, under this section, together with section conferring power to issue bonds for construction and purchase of needful buildings for use of the city, conferred authority upon metropolitan city to issue bonds to pay cost of construction of fire-engine houses. Linn v. City of Omaha, 76 Neb. 552, 107 N.W. 983 (1906). Unless reasonable notice is given to owner to perform work, all proceedings and assessments by city are void. Shannon v. City of Omaha, 72 Neb. 281, 100 N.W. 298 (1904); Albers v. City of Omaha, 56 Neb. 357, 76 N.W. 911 (1898). City was not liable for acts of building inspector. Murray v. City of Omaha, 66 Neb. 279, 92 N.W. 299 (1902). Charter granting power to impound animals running at large is not in conflict with state herd law which is not applicable to cultivated lands within limits of cities. Lingonner v. Ambler, 44 Neb. 316, 62 N.W. 486 (1895).

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 14-102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/14-102.