North Dakota Statutes
§ 31-11-05 — Maxims of jurisprudence - How to be used and applied - List
North Dakota § 31-11-05
This text of North Dakota § 31-11-05 (Maxims of jurisprudence - How to be used and applied - List) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.D. Cent. Code § 31-11-05 (2026).
Text
The maxims of jurisprudence set forth in this section are not intended to qualify any of the provisions of the laws of this state, but to aid in their just application:
1.When the reason of a rule ceases so should the rule itself.
2.When the reason is the same the rule should be the same.
3.A person must not change that person's purpose to the injury of another.
4.Anyone may waive the advantage of a law intended solely for that person's benefit, but
a law established for a public reason cannot be contravened by a private agreement.
5.One must so use one's own rights as not to infringe upon the rights of another.
6.One who consents to an act is not wronged by it.
7.Acquiescence in error takes away the right of objecting to it.
8.A person cannot take advantage of that person's own wr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Koch v. Williams
456 N.W.2d 299 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1990)
Nelson v. Gillette
1997 ND 205 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n
337 N.W.2d 427 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Western State Bank
2008 ND 104 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2008)
Johnson v. Johnson
2000 ND 170 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)
Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureau
1997 ND 178 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Mitchell v. Preusse
358 N.W.2d 511 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
Mahoney v. Mahoney
516 N.W.2d 656 (North Dakota Court of Appeals, 1994)
Jahner v. Jacob
515 N.W.2d 183 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Beavers v. Walters
537 N.W.2d 647 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial Commission
2012 ND 33 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2012)
Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas Corporation
2017 ND 254 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2017)
Johnson v. Peterbilt of Fargo, Inc.
438 N.W.2d 162 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
Carlson Homes, Inc. v. Messmer
307 N.W.2d 564 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1981)
Dietz v. City of Medora
333 N.W.2d 702 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Porter v. Porter
2006 ND 123 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2006)
Meyer v. Meyer
2004 ND 89 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire
2004 ND 171 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2004)
Grager v. Schudar
2009 ND 140 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Olson v. Job Service North Dakota
2013 ND 24 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2013)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 31-01-02
Competency of husband or wife as witness - Communications made during marriage - Exceptions§ 31-01-04
When husband or wife may testify to transactions and conversations had with deceased spouse§ 31-01-06.4
General rule of privilege§ 31-01-06.5
Who may claim the privilege§ 31-01-06.6
Exceptions to the privilegeCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
North Dakota § 31-11-05, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nd/31-11-05.