Montana § 30-9A-330 Purchase Of Chattel Paper Or Instrument

Montana Statutes

§ 30-9A-330 — Purchase Of Chattel Paper Or Instrument

Montana § 30-9A-330

Title 30TRADE AND COMMERCE

Ch. 9AUNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECURED TRANSACTIONS

Part 3Perfection and Priority

This text of Montana § 30-9A-330 (Purchase Of Chattel Paper Or Instrument) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mont. Code Ann. § 30-9A-330 (2026).

Text

30-9A-330 . Purchase of chattel paper or instrument.

(1)A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper that is claimed merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if:

(a)in good faith and in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of each authoritative tangible copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper and obtains control under 30-9A-105 of each authoritative electronic copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper; and

(b)the authoritative copies of the record evidencing the chattel paper do not indicate that the chattel paper has been assigned to an identified assignee other than the purchaser.

(2)A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security int

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

30-9A-330 . Purchase of chattel paper or instrument. (1) A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper that is claimed merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if:
(a) in good faith and in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of each authoritative tangible copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper and obtains control under 30-9A-105 of each authoritative electronic copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper; and
(b) the authoritative copies of the record evidencing the chattel paper do not indicate that the chattel paper has been assigned to an identified assignee other than the purchaser.
(2) A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper that is claimed other than merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if the purchaser gives new value, takes possession of each authoritative tangible copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper, and obtains control under 30-9A-105 of each authoritative electronic copy of the record evidencing the chattel paper in good faith, in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in 30-9A-327 , a purchaser having priority in chattel paper under subsection (1) or (2) also has priority in proceeds of the chattel paper to the extent that:
(a) 30-9A-322 provides for priority in the proceeds; or
(b) the proceeds consist of the specific goods covered by the chattel paper or cash proceeds of the specific goods, even if the purchaser's security interest in the proceeds is unperfected.
(4) Except as otherwise provided in 30-9A-331 (1), a purchaser of an instrument has priority over a security interest in the instrument perfected by a method other than possession if the purchaser gives value and takes possession of the instrument in good faith and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.
(5) For purposes of subsections (1) and (2), the holder of a purchase-money security interest in inventory gives new value for chattel paper constituting proceeds of the inventory.
(6) For purposes of subsections (2) and (4), if the authoritative copies of the record evidencing chattel paper or an instrument indicates that the chattel paper or instrument has been assigned to an identified secured party other than the purchaser, a purchaser of the chattel paper or instrument has knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.