Montana § 40-5-1013 Continuing Jurisdiction To Enforce Child Support Order

Montana Statutes

§ 40-5-1013 — Continuing Jurisdiction To Enforce Child Support Order

Montana § 40-5-1013

Title 40FAMILY LAW

Ch. 5ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT

Part 10Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

This text of Montana § 40-5-1013 (Continuing Jurisdiction To Enforce Child Support Order) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mont. Code Ann. § 40-5-1013 (2026).

Text

40-5-1013 . Continuing jurisdiction to enforce child support order.

(1)A tribunal of this state that has issued a child support order consistent with the law of this state may serve as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to enforce:

(a)the order if the order is the controlling order and has not been modified by a tribunal of another state that assumed jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act; or

(b)a money judgment for arrears of support and interest on the order accrued before a determination that an order of a tribunal of another state is the controlling order.

(2)A tribunal of this state having continuing jurisdiction over a support order may act as a responding tribunal to enforce the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

40-5-1013 . Continuing jurisdiction to enforce child support order. (1) A tribunal of this state that has issued a child support order consistent with the law of this state may serve as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to enforce:
(a) the order if the order is the controlling order and has not been modified by a tribunal of another state that assumed jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act; or
(b) a money judgment for arrears of support and interest on the order accrued before a determination that an order of a tribunal of another state is the controlling order.
(2) A tribunal of this state having continuing jurisdiction over a support order may act as a responding tribunal to enforce the order.