Montana Statutes
§ 1-3-220 — What Ought To Have Been Done
Montana § 1-3-220
JurisdictionMontana
Title 1GENERAL LAWS AND DEFINITIONS
Ch. 3MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE
Part 2Text of Maxims
This text of Montana § 1-3-220 (What Ought To Have Been Done) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mont. Code Ann. § 1-3-220 (2026).
Text
1-3-220 . What ought to have been done. That which ought to have been done is to be regarded as done, in favor of a person to whom and against a person from whom performance is due.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Legislative History
En. Sec. 4620, Civ. C. 1895; re-en. Sec. 6197, Rev. C. 1907; re-en. Sec. 8758, R.C.M. 1921; Cal. Civ. C. Sec. 3529; Field Civ. C. Sec. 1984; re-en. Sec. 8758, R.C.M. 1935; R.C.M. 1947, 49-121; amd. Sec. 22, Ch. 61, L. 2007.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 1-3-101
Purpose Of Maxims§ 1-3-102
Through 1-3-109 Reserved§ 1-3-110
Mountain Daylight Time§ 1-3-201
Obsolete Reason, Obsolete Rule§ 1-3-202
Same Reason, Same Rule§ 1-3-203
Change In Purpose§ 1-3-204
Waiver Of Benefit Of Law§ 1-3-205
Limit On Rights§ 1-3-206
Consent§ 1-3-207
Acquiescence§ 1-3-208
Own Wrong -- No Advantage§ 1-3-209
Fraudulent Dispossession§ 1-3-210
Acts On One's Behalf§ 1-3-211
Acts Of Others§ 1-3-212
Benefit -- BurdenCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Montana § 1-3-220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/mt/3/1-3-220.