Minnesota § 3E.06 EFFECT OF AUTHENTICATION

Minnesota Statutes

§ 3E.06 — EFFECT OF AUTHENTICATION

Minnesota § 3E.06

PartLEGISLATURE

Ch. 3EUNIFORM ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL ACT

This text of Minnesota § 3E.06 (EFFECT OF AUTHENTICATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minn. Stat. § 3E.06 (2026).

Text

Subdivision 1.Presumption of accuracy.
Legal material in an electronic record that is authenticated under section3E.05is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.

Subd. 2.Presumption in another state.
If another state has adopted a law substantially similar to this chapter, legal material in an electronic record that is designated as official and authenticated by the official publisher in that state is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.

Subd. 3.Burden of proof.
A party contesting the authentication of legal material in an electronic record authenticated under section3E.05has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the record is not authentic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Subdivision 1.Presumption of accuracy.
Legal material in an electronic record that is authenticated under section3E.05is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.

Subd. 2.Presumption in another state.
If another state has adopted a law substantially similar to this chapter, legal material in an electronic record that is designated as official and authenticated by the official publisher in that state is presumed to be an accurate copy of the legal material.

Subd. 3.Burden of proof.
A party contesting the authentication of legal material in an electronic record authenticated under section3E.05has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the record is not authentic.