Minnesota § 114C.23 REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE SCHEDULES

Minnesota Statutes

§ 114C.23 — REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE SCHEDULES

Minnesota § 114C.23

PartENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Ch. 114CENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY INNOVATIONS

This text of Minnesota § 114C.23 (REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE SCHEDULES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Minn. Stat. § 114C.23 (2026).

Text

(a)A reasonable performance schedule prepared under section114C.22, subdivision 2, clause (4), must be approved by the commissioner. In reviewing the reasonableness of a performance schedule, the commissioner shall take into account information supplied by the regulated entity, any public comments, and information developed by agency staff. The decision about whether a performance schedule is reasonable must be based on the following factors:

(1)the nature of the violations;

(2)the environmental and public health consequences of the violations;

(3)the economic circumstances of the facility;

(4)the availability of equipment and material; and

(5)the time needed to implement pollution prevention opportunities as an alternative to pollution control approaches to remedying the violations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) A reasonable performance schedule prepared under section114C.22, subdivision 2, clause (4), must be approved by the commissioner. In reviewing the reasonableness of a performance schedule, the commissioner shall take into account information supplied by the regulated entity, any public comments, and information developed by agency staff. The decision about whether a performance schedule is reasonable must be based on the following factors:
(1) the nature of the violations;
(2) the environmental and public health consequences of the violations;
(3) the economic circumstances of the facility;
(4) the availability of equipment and material; and
(5) the time needed to implement pollution prevention opportunities as an alternative to pollution control approaches to remedying the violations. Information submitted to the commissioner that is trade secret information, as that term is defined in section13.37, is nonpublic data under chapter 13.
(b) In the event of a dispute over approval of the performance schedule, the regulated entity may request a hearing under the procedures in Minnesota Rules, parts1400.8510to1400.8612. A performance schedule may be amended by written agreement between the commissioner and the regulated entity.