The court may authorize a curator, in the name and on behalf of the interdict, to make donations inter vivos from the surplus funds or other surplus property of the interdict, of a value annually of not more than the greater of fourteen thousand dollars or the maximum amount that may be excluded from federal gift taxation pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §2503(b), to each of the direct descendants of the interdict, when:
(1)There is no known testamentary disposition to the contrary.
(2)These donations are equal with respect to all descendants of the interdict in the same degree, and will not impinge upon the legitime of any forced heir of the interdict.
(3)The court is satisfied from the evidence presented to it that, prior to his interdiction, the interdict had made donations inter vivos to each
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The court may authorize a curator, in the name and on behalf of the interdict, to make donations inter vivos from the surplus funds or other surplus property of the interdict, of a value annually of not more than the greater of fourteen thousand dollars or the maximum amount that may be excluded from federal gift taxation pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §2503(b), to each of the direct descendants of the interdict, when:
(1) There is no known testamentary disposition to the contrary.
(2) These donations are equal with respect to all descendants of the interdict in the same degree, and will not impinge upon the legitime of any forced heir of the interdict.
(3) The court is satisfied from the evidence presented to it that, prior to his interdiction, the interdict had made donations inter vivos to each of his direct descendants in each of at least four calendar years, not necessarily consecutive, of sums of money amounting to, or of property valued at, three thousand dollars or more.
(4) The curator has obtained the consent of the interdict's spouse and heirs of the first degree.
(5) The proposed donations will not discriminate between descendants of the interdict, will not materially impair the financial condition of the interdict and are not likely to deprive him of sufficient funds to care for his future needs and support. In order to establish that the proposed donations will not deprive the interdict of sufficient funds to provide for his future needs and support, the curator must satisfy the court, from the evidence presented to it, that the total fair market value of the interdict's estate, after subtracting the value of the proposed donations, is not less than a sum amounting to: sixty-five thousand dollars multiplied by the number of years of life expectancy remaining to the interdict at the time of the donation, as determined by his age and the table of life expectancy set out in R.S. 47:2405.
(6) The procedure prescribed by Articles 4271 and 4566 of the Code of Civil Procedure is complied with. When all of the conditions prescribed in Paragraphs (1) through (5) above have been met, the court may authorize such donations to be made to the curator individually, if he is a direct descendant of the interdict, on the recommendation of the undercurator concurred in by an undercurator ad hoc appointed by the court.
(7) If a contrary testamentary disposition is discovered following the interdict's death, the donee shall restore the donated property to the interdict's estate or pay the estate the value of the gift.