Kansas Statutes
§ 75-6116 — Defense and payment of liability and defense costs of employee in civil cases; payment of punitive or exemplary damages or reimbursement of related defense costs; compromise or settlement of claim; not a waiver of immunity; certain health care providers considered employees
(a)If an employee of a governmental entity is or could be subject to personal civil liability on account of a noncriminal act or omission which is within the scope of the employee's employment and which allegedly violates the civil rights laws of the United States or of the state of Kansas, the governmental entity:
(1)Shall provide for the defense of any civil action or proceeding which arises out of the act or omission and which is brought against the employee in the employee's official or individual capacity, or both, to the extent and under the conditions and limitations provided by K.S.A. 75-6108 and amendments thereto for the defense of actions and proceedings under the Kansas tort claims act; and
(2)may reimburse the employee attorney fees, costs and expenses incurred in defending
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kansas § 75-6116 (Defense and payment of liability and defense costs of employee in civil cases; payment of punitive or exemplary damages or reimbursement of related defense costs; compromise or settlement of claim; not a waiver of immunity; certain health care providers considered employees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Innes v. Kansas State University
184 F.3d 1275 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Jones v. Courtney
466 F. App'x 696 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
King v. Pimentel
890 P.2d 1217 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1995)
Barger v. State of Kan.
620 F. Supp. 1432 (D. Kansas, 1985)
Miller v. Brungardt
916 F. Supp. 1096 (D. Kansas, 1996)
Medcalf v. State of Kan.
626 F. Supp. 1179 (D. Kansas, 1986)
Carter v. Sedgwick County, Kan.
705 F. Supp. 1474 (D. Kansas, 1988)
Lumry v. State, Kansas Bureau of Investigation
307 P.3d 232 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2013)
Carter v. Sedgwick County
685 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kansas, 1988)
De Young v. Kansas
890 F. Supp. 949 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Urban v. Henley
654 F. Supp. 870 (D. Kansas, 1987)
Attorney General Opinion No.
(Kansas Attorney General Reports, 2002)
Bateast v. Orunsolu
(D. Kansas, 2024)
Brantley v. Richards
(D. Kansas, 2020)
Bruce v. Kelly
(D. Kansas, 2021)
Couser v. Somers
(D. Kansas, 2020)
Dartez (ID 87393) v. Peters
(D. Kansas, 2022)
De Young v. State of Kan.
890 F. Supp. 949 (D. Kansas, 1995)
Douglas Stuart Queen v. Natalie Canale, et al.
(D. Kansas, 2025)
Downard v. Schmidt
(D. Kansas, 2021)
Legislative History
L. 1979, ch. 186, § 16; L. 1983, ch. 299, § 2; L. 1985, ch. 293, § 1; L. 1987, ch. 353, § 8; L. 1989, ch. 279, § 1; July 1.