Indiana Statutes
§ 31-9-2-98 — "Property"
Indiana § 31-9-2-98
JurisdictionIndiana
Art. 9DEFINITIONS
This text of Indiana § 31-9-2-98 ("Property") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ind. Code § 31-9-2-98 (2026).
Text
(a)"Property", for purposes of the Uniform
Premarital Agreement Act under IC 31-11-3, has the meaning set forth
in IC 31-11-3-3.
(b)"Property", for purposes of IC 31-15, IC 31-16, and IC 31-17,
means all the assets of either party or both parties, including:
(1)a present right to withdraw pension or retirement benefits;
(2)the right to receive pension or retirement benefits that are not
forfeited upon termination of employment or that are vested (as
defined in Section 411 of the Internal Revenue Code) but that are
payable after the dissolution of marriage; and
(3)the right to receive disposable retired or retainer pay (as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 1408(a)) acquired during the marriage that
is or may be payable after the dissolution of marriage.
[Pre-1997 Recodification Citations: subsectio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hill v. Hill
863 N.E.2d 456 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007)
Amy L. Falatovics v. Imre L. Falatovics
15 N.E.3d 108 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2014)
Bizik v. Bizik
753 N.E.2d 762 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Akers v. Akers
729 N.E.2d 1029 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Bingley v. Bingley
935 N.E.2d 152 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2010)
Granzow v. Granzow
855 N.E.2d 680 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2006)
Beckley v. Beckley
822 N.E.2d 158 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2005)
Marriage of Elkins v. Elkins
763 N.E.2d 482 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
Marriage of Dowden v. Allman
696 N.E.2d 456 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Antonacopulos v. Antonacopulos
753 N.E.2d 759 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2001)
Wyzard v. Wyzard
771 N.E.2d 754 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2002)
Samuel W. Koonce v. Kim M. Finney
68 N.E.3d 1086 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2017)
Bingley v. Bingley
915 N.E.2d 1006 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2009)
Harvey v. Harvey
695 N.E.2d 162 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Paul D. Edwards v. Zobeida E. Bonilla-Vega
983 N.E.2d 619 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Tracy v. Tracy
717 N.E.2d 183 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Stanley C. Huguenard v. Cherie M. Huguenard (mem. dec.)
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2020)
Kejbir Singh Bal v. Shivali Bal (mem. dec.)
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2020)
W. Aaron Robertson v. Christy (Robertson) Porter (mem. dec.)
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2020)
In the Matter of the Marriage of: Ruth Morales v. Rolando Morales (mem. dec.)
(Indiana Court of Appeals, 2020)
Legislative History
As added by P.L.1-1997, SEC.1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 31-10-1-1
Purpose of recodification act§ 31-10-1-2
Statutory construction§ 31-10-1-3
Effect on existing rights and liabilities§ 31-10-1-5
References to repealed or replaced statutes§ 31-10-1-7
References to rules§ 31-10-2-1
Policy and purpose§ 31-10-2-3
Rights of persons with a disability§ 31-11-0.1-1
"Repealed statutes"§ 31-11-1-1
Same sex marriages prohibitedCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Indiana § 31-9-2-98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/in/31-9-2-98.