Indiana Statutes
§ 26-1-2-314 — Implied warranty; merchantability; usage of trade
(1)Unless excluded or modified (IC 26-1-2-316), a warranty that the goods shall be merchantable is implied
in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to
goods of that kind. Under this section the serving for value of food or
drink to be consumed either on the premises or elsewhere is a sale.
(2)Goods to be merchantable must at least be such as:
(a)pass without objection in the trade under the contract
description; and
(b)in the case of fungible goods, are of fair, average quality
within the description; and
(c)are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are
used; and
(d)run, within the variations permitted by the agreement, of even
kind, quality, and quantity within each unit and among all units
involved; and
(e)are adequately contained, package
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Indiana § 26-1-2-314 (Implied warranty; merchantability; usage of trade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.
621 N.E.2d 1078 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1993)
Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc.
621 N.E.2d 1069 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1993)
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. Goodin
822 N.E.2d 947 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2005)
Johnson v. Scandia Associates, Inc.
717 N.E.2d 24 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
814 N.E.2d 634 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Hedges v. Public Serv. Co. of Indiana, Inc.
396 N.E.2d 933 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1979)
Richards-Wilcox, Inc. v. Cummins
700 N.E.2d 496 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Coyle Chevrolet Co. v. Carrier
397 N.E.2d 1283 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1979)
TLB Plastics Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co.
542 N.E.2d 1373 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1989)
Irmscher Suppliers, Inc. v. Schuler
909 N.E.2d 1040 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2009)
B & B Paint Corp. v. Shrock Manufacturing, Inc.
568 N.E.2d 1017 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1991)
Travel Craft, Inc. v. Wilhelm Mende GmbH & Co.
552 N.E.2d 443 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1990)
Wilson v. Royal Motor Sales, Inc.
812 N.E.2d 133 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Atkinson v. P & G-Clairol, Inc.
813 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (N.D. Indiana, 2011)
Hughes v. Chattem, Inc.
818 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (S.D. Indiana, 2011)
Mac's Eggs, Inc. v. Rite-Way Agri Distributors, Inc.
656 F. Supp. 720 (N.D. Indiana, 1987)
Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.
601 N.E.2d 429 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1992)
Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
714 N.E.2d 1218 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1999)
Pizel v. Monaco Coach Corp.
364 F. Supp. 2d 790 (N.D. Indiana, 2005)
Johnson v. Scandia Associates, Inc.
641 N.E.2d 51 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1995)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 26-1-1-0.3
Certain security interests considered perfected§ 26-1-1-0.5
Status of certain security interests; conditions; lapsing of perfection;
filing of financing statements§ 26-1-1-101
Short title; application§ 26-1-1-104
Construction against implicit repeal§ 26-1-1-105
Repealed§ 26-1-1-106
Remedies to be liberally administered§ 26-1-1-108
Severability