Indiana § 24-11-3-2 Factors as evidence of bad faith

Indiana Statutes

§ 24-11-3-2 — Factors as evidence of bad faith

Indiana § 24-11-3-2

Art. 11BAD FAITH ASSERTIONS OF PATENT

Ch. 3Assertions of Patent Infringements in Bad Faith

This text of Indiana § 24-11-3-2 (Factors as evidence of bad faith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ind. Code § 24-11-3-2 (2026).

Text

(a)A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has made an assertion of patent infringement in bad faith:

(1)The person distributed a demand letter that does not contain all the following information:

(A)The patent number of the patent that the person claims is being infringed.

(B)The name and address of:

(i)a patent owner;

(ii)if applicable, any assignee of the patent; and

(iii)if applicable, a patent owner's or assignee's agent who is retained by the patent owner or assignee to enforce the patent.

(C)Factual allegations identifying specific areas in which the target's products, services, and technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claims in the patent.

(2)The person fails to:

(A)conduct an analysis comparing the claims in the patent to the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) A court may consider the following factors
as evidence that a person has made an assertion of patent infringement
in bad faith:
(1) The person distributed a demand letter that does not contain
all the following information:
(A) The patent number of the patent that the person claims is
being infringed.
(B) The name and address of:
(i) a patent owner;
(ii) if applicable, any assignee of the patent; and
(iii) if applicable, a patent owner's or assignee's agent who is
retained by the patent owner or assignee to enforce the patent.
(C) Factual allegations identifying specific areas in which the
target's products, services, and technology infringe the patent or
are covered by the claims in the patent.
(2) The person fails to:
(A) conduct an analysis comparing the claims in the patent to
the target's products, services, and technology; or
(B) identify, if the person conducts an analysis described in
clause (A), specific areas in which the target's products,
services, and technology are covered by the claims in the
patent.
(3) If the demand letter does not contain the information
described in subdivision (1), the person that distributed the
demand letter fails to provide the information within a reasonable
amount of time after the target requests the information.
(4) The person demands:
(A) payment of a license fee; or
(B) a response from the target;
within an unreasonably short period of time.
(5) The person offers to license the patent for an amount that is
not based on a reasonable estimate of the value of the license.
(6) The claim or assertion of patent infringement is meritless, and
the person knew, or should have known, that the claim or
assertion is meritless.
(7) The claim or assertion of patent infringement is deceptive.
(8) The person or the person's subsidiaries or affiliates have
previously filed or threatened to file a lawsuit based on the same
or similar claim of patent infringement and the:
(A) filing or threats to file lacked the information described in
subdivision (1); or
(B) person attempted to enforce the claim of patent
infringement in litigation and a court found the claim to be
meritless.
(9) Any other factor the court finds relevant.
(b) A person may not use the failure of a target to request any
information described in subsection (a)(1) that is not contained in the
demand letter as a defense to an action under this article.