Indiana § 21-39.5-6-2 Complaint process final decision review

Indiana Statutes

§ 21-39.5-6-2 — Complaint process final decision review

Indiana § 21-39.5-6-2

Title 21HIGHER EDUCATION

Art. 39.5STATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: THE

Ch. 6Construction and Enforcement

This text of Indiana § 21-39.5-6-2 (Complaint process final decision review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ind. Code § 21-39.5-6-2 (2026).

Text

(a)As used in this chapter, "petitioner" means any of the following:

(1)A student of an institution.

(2)An employee of an institution.

(b)After completing any applicable complaint process established by the institution regarding a violation of this article, a petitioner may request that the commission for higher education review the institution's final decision under the following circumstances:

(1)A procedural defect materially affected the institution's final decision.

(2)New evidence that materially affects the institution's final decision and was not reasonably available at the time the final decision was rendered becomes available.

(3)The institution's investigator had a conflict of interest or bias concerning the petitioner that materially affected the institution's final deci

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) As used in this chapter, "petitioner"
means any of the following:
(1) A student of an institution.
(2) An employee of an institution.
(b) After completing any applicable complaint process established
by the institution regarding a violation of this article, a petitioner may
request that the commission for higher education review the
institution's final decision under the following circumstances:
(1) A procedural defect materially affected the institution's final
decision.
(2) New evidence that materially affects the institution's final
decision and was not reasonably available at the time the final
decision was rendered becomes available.
(3) The institution's investigator had a conflict of interest or bias
concerning the petitioner that materially affected the institution's
final decision.
(4) The petitioner believes the institution disregarded law in
rendering a final decision.
(c) The commission for higher education shall review the request
submitted under subsection (b) and issue a final opinion regarding the
request not later than sixty (60) days after the date that the commission
for higher education receives the request.
(d) The commission for higher education may enter into an
agreement with the office of administrative law proceedings
established by IC 4-15-10.5 to carry out this section.