Illinois § 29B-14 Innocent owner hearing

Illinois Statutes

§ 29B-14 — Innocent owner hearing

Illinois § 29B-14

JurisdictionIllinois

TopicRIGHTS AND REMEDIES

Ch. 720CRIMINAL OFFENSES

Act 720 ILCS 5/Criminal Code of 2012.

Art.Title III - Specific Offenses

This text of Illinois § 29B-14 (Innocent owner hearing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 29B-14 (2026).

Text

(a)After a complaint for forfeiture has been filed and all claimants have appeared and answered, a claimant may file a motion with the court for an innocent owner hearing prior to trial. This motion shall be made and supported by sworn affidavit and shall assert the following along with specific facts that support each assertion:

(1)that the claimant filing the motion is the true owner of the conveyance as interpreted by case law;

(2)that the claimant was not legally accountable for the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture or acquiesced in the conduct;

(3)that the claimant did not solicit, conspire, or attempt to commit the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture;

(4)that the claimant did not know or did not have reason to know that the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture was likely

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(a) After a complaint for forfeiture has been filed and all claimants have appeared and answered, a claimant may file a motion with the court for an innocent owner hearing prior to trial. This motion shall be made and supported by sworn affidavit and shall assert the following along with specific facts that support each assertion: (1) that the claimant filing the motion is the true owner of the conveyance as interpreted by case law; (2) that the claimant was not legally accountable for the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture or acquiesced in the conduct; (3) that the claimant did not solicit, conspire, or attempt to commit the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture; (4) that the claimant did not know or did not have reason to know that the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture was likely to occur; and (5) that the claimant did not hold the property for the benefit of, or as nominee for, any person whose conduct gave rise to its forfeiture, or if the claimant acquired the interest through any person, the claimant acquired it as a bona fide purchaser for value or acquired the interest without knowledge of the seizure of the property for forfeiture. (b) The claimant's motion shall include specific facts supporting these assertions. (c) Upon this filing, a hearing may only be conducted after the parties have been given the opportunity to conduct limited discovery as to the ownership and control of the property, the claimant's knowledge, or any matter relevant to the issues raised or facts alleged in the claimant's motion. Discovery shall be limited to the People's requests in these areas but may proceed by any means allowed in the Code of Civil Procedure. (1) After discovery is complete and the court has allowed for sufficient time to review and investigate the discovery responses, the court shall conduct a hearing. At the hearing, the fact that the conveyance is subject to forfeiture shall not be at issue. The court shall only hear evidence relating to the issue of innocent ownership. (2) At the hearing on the motion, it shall be the burden of the claimant to prove each of the assertions listed in subsection (a) of this Section by a preponderance of the evidence. (3) If a claimant meets his or her burden of proof, the court shall grant the motion and order the property returned to the claimant. If the claimant fails to meet his or her burden of proof, then the court shall deny the motion and the forfeiture case shall proceed according to the Code of Civil Procedure.