Idaho Statutes
§ 72-508 — AUTHORITY TO ADOPT RULES AND REGULATIONS
Idaho·Title 72 WORKER’S COMPENSATION AND RELATED LAWS — INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION·Ch. 5 INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION
Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, the commission shall have authority to promulgate and adopt reasonable rules and regulations for effecting the purposes of this act. Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, the commission shall have authority to promulgate and adopt reasonable rules and regulations involving judicial matters. In administrative matters and all other matters, the commission shall be bound by the provisions of chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code. Rules and regulations as promulgated and adopted, if not inconsistent with law, shall be binding in the administration of this law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Idaho § 72-508 (AUTHORITY TO ADOPT RULES AND REGULATIONS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rhodes v. Industrial Commission
868 P.2d 467 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1993)
Dumaw v. J.L. Norton Logging
795 P.2d 312 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
Curr v. Curr
864 P.2d 132 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1993)
Morris v. Hap Taylor & Sons, Inc.
301 P.3d 639 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2013)
Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.
179 P.3d 265 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2008)
Steen v. Denny's Restaurant
16 P.3d 910 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2000)
Cantu v. J.R. Simplot Co.
826 P.2d 1297 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
Mancilla v. Greg
963 P.2d 368 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1998)
Smith v. Idaho Department of Labor
218 P.3d 1133 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center v. Edmondson
937 P.2d 420 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1997)
Emery v. J.R. Simplot Co.
111 P.3d 92 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2005)
Hill v. State, Department of Employment
779 P.2d 402 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1989)
Monroe v. Chapman
668 P.2d 1000 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Seiniger Law Offices, P.A. v. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission
299 P.3d 773 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2013)
Cheung v. Pena
137 P.3d 417 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2006)
Davis v. Hammack Management, Inc.
391 P.3d 1261 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2017)
Ayala v. Robert J. Meyers Farms, Inc.
445 P.3d 164 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2019)
Ayala v. Meyers Farms
(Idaho Supreme Court, 2019)
Burton v. State
875 P.2d 927 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1994)
Coronado v. City of Boise
(Idaho Supreme Court, 2025)
Legislative History
[72-508, added I.C., sec. 72-508, as added by 1971, ch. 124, sec. 3, p. 422; am. 1974, ch. 70, sec. 1, p. 1151; am. 1976, ch. 264, sec. 1, p. 889.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 72-1001
SHORT TITLE§ 72-1002
LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE AND INTENT§ 72-1003
DEFINITIONS§ 72-1004
POWERS AND DUTIES OF COMMISSION§ 72-1005
REHABILITATION OF VICTIMS§ 72-1006
ATTORNEYS’ FEES§ 72-1009
CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION ACCOUNT§ 72-101
SHORT TITLE§ 72-1010
RECEIPT OF FUNDS§ 72-1012
APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION§ 72-1013
INFORMAL HEARINGS§ 72-1014
EVIDENCE OF CONDITION