Idaho Statutes
§ 19-4206 — PRISONERS REQUIRED TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES IN CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT CASES
Idaho § 19-4206
JurisdictionIdaho
Title 19CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Ch. 42HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES ACT
This text of Idaho § 19-4206 (PRISONERS REQUIRED TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES IN CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT CASES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Idaho Code § 19-4206 (2026).
Text
(1)Unless a petitioner who is a prisoner establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, no petition for writ of habeas corpus or any other civil action shall be brought by any person confined in a state or county institution, or in a state, local or private correctional facility, with respect to conditions of confinement until all available administrative remedies have been exhausted. If the institution, or state, local or private correctional facility does not have a system for administrative remedy, this requirement shall be waived.
(2)At the time of filing, the petitioner shall submit, together with the petition for writ of habeas corpus a true, correct and complete copy of any documentation which demonstrates that he has exhaust
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marks v. Vehlow
671 P.2d 473 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Drennon v. Fisher
120 P.3d 1146 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2005)
Drennon v. Idaho State Correctional Institution
181 P.3d 524 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2007)
Burghart v. Carlin
264 P.3d 71 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2011)
Butters v. Valdez
241 P.3d 7 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2010)
State v. Strange
214 P.3d 672 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 2009)
Meadows v. Atencio
(D. Idaho, 2021)
Raymond Watkins v. Warden Hardison
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2010)
Rogstad v. Overguard
(D. Idaho, 2019)
William Gray v. Kristi Lynch
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2012)
William Lightner v. M. Tidwell
(Idaho Court of Appeals, 2010)
Williams v. Hollinshead
(Idaho Supreme Court, 2020)
Legislative History
[19-4206, added 1999, ch. 376, sec. 2, p. 1029; am. 2000, ch. 271, sec. 4, p. 780.]
Nearby Sections
15
§ 19-1001
CHALLENGE — BY WHOM MADE§ 19-1002
GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE TO PANEL§ 19-1004
FORM OF CHALLENGE§ 19-1005
DECISION UPON CHALLENGE§ 19-1009
OBJECTIONS MUST BE BY CHALLENGE§ 19-1010
APPOINTMENT OF FOREMAN§ 19-1011
OATH OF FOREMAN§ 19-1012
OATH OF JURORS§ 19-1013
CHARGE TO JURY§ 19-1014
RETIREMENT AND DISCHARGE OF JURYCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Idaho § 19-4206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/id/19-4206.