Georgia Statutes
§ 13-3-20 — Minors - Contracts for property or valuable consideration; contracts for necessaries
Georgia § 13-3-20
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title13
This text of Georgia § 13-3-20 (Minors - Contracts for property or valuable consideration; contracts for necessaries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 13-3-20 (2026).
Text
(a)Generally the contract of a minor is voidable. If in a contractual transaction a minor receives property or other valuable consideration and, after arrival at the age of 18, retains possession of such property or continues to enjoy the benefit of such other valuable consideration, the minor shall have thereby ratified or affirmed the contract and it shall be binding on him or her. Such contractual transaction shall also be binding upon any minor who becomes emancipated by operation of law or pursuant to Article 10 of Chapter 11 of Title 15.
(b)The contract of a minor for necessaries shall be binding on the minor as if the minor were 18 years of age except that the party furnishing them to the minor shall prove that the parent or guardian of such minor had failed or refused to supply s
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelley v. State
503 S.E.2d 881 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Mrozinski v. Pogue
423 S.E.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Kay
589 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Smoky, Inc. v. McCray
396 S.E.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Boykins v. State
680 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Richards v. Richards
637 S.E.2d 672 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank
57 F.4th 1203 (Eleventh Circuit, 2023)
Noah Smith v. Adventure Air Sports Kennesaw, LLC
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020)
Christina McDaniel v. State
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021)
Sayers v. Microsoft Corporation
(S.D. Georgia, 2025)
Burgundy Guzman, as Surviving Spouse of Paul Guzman v. Carsten Link
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020)
Legislative History
Amended by 2013 Ga. Laws 127,§ 4-3, eff. 1/1/2014. Amended by 2006 Ga. Laws 466,§ 3, eff. 7/1/2006.
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 13-3-20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/13-3-20.