Georgia Statutes
§ 11-2-316 — Exclusion or modification of warranties
Georgia § 11-2-316
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title11
This text of Georgia § 11-2-316 (Exclusion or modification of warranties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 11-2-316 (2026).
Text
(1)Words or conduct relevant to the creation of an express warranty and words or conduct tending to negate or limit warranty shall be construed wherever reasonable as consistent with each other; but subject to the provisions of this article on parol or extrinsic evidence (Code Section 11-2-202 ) negation or limitation is inoperative to the extent that such construction is unreasonable.
(2)Subject to subsection (3) of this Code section, to exclude or modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language must mention merchantability and in case of a writing must be conspicuous, and to exclude or modify any implied warranty of fitness the exclusion must be by a writing and conspicuous. Language to exclude all implied warranties of fitness is sufficient if it states,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Freeman v. Hubco Leasing, Inc.
324 S.E.2d 462 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1985)
Hall v. Skate Escape, Ltd.
319 S.E.2d 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Bennett v. Matt Gay Chevrolet Oldsmobile, Inc.
408 S.E.2d 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
D.L. Lee & Sons, Inc. v. ADT Security Systems, Mid-South, Inc.
916 F. Supp. 1571 (S.D. Georgia, 1995)
General Motors Corp. v. Green
325 S.E.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
McCrimmon v. Tandy Corp.
414 S.E.2d 15 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Tri-State Consumer Insurance v. Lexisnexis Risk Solutions Inc.
823 F. Supp. 2d 1306 (N.D. Georgia, 2011)
Leland Industries, Inc. v. Suntek Industries, Inc.
362 S.E.2d 441 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Laibe Corp. v. General Pump & Well, Inc.
733 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Trickett v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.
542 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (S.D. Georgia, 2008)
W. Linton Howard, Inc. v. Gibbs Machinery, Inc.
314 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Jones v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.
705 F. Supp. 561 (N.D. Georgia, 1987)
Leland Indus. v. SUNTEK INDUS
362 S.E.2d 441 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Wilson v. MarineMax E., Inc.
303 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (N.D. Georgia, 2018)
Laibe Corporation v. General Pump & Well, Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Velma Veasley v. Monitronics International, Inc.
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-1-101
Short titles§ 11-1-102
Scope of article§ 11-1-104
Construction against implicit repeal§ 11-1-105
Severability§ 11-1-106
Use of singular and plural; gender§ 11-1-107
Section captions§ 11-1-201
General definitions§ 11-1-202
Notice; knowledge§ 11-1-204
Value§ 11-1-205
Reasonable time; seasonableness§ 11-1-206
PresumptionsCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 11-2-316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/11-2-316.