District of Columbia Statutes

§ 5-716 — Survivor benefits and annuities.

District of Columbia·Title 5 Police, Firefighters, Medical Examiner, and Forensic Sciences.·Ch. 7 Police and Firefighters Retirement and Disability.·Subch. I Retirement and Disability, 1916.
(a)If any member:
(1)dies in the performance of duty and the Mayor determines that:
(A)the member’s death was the sole and direct result of a personal injury sustained while performing such duty;
(B)his death was not caused by his willful misconduct or by his intention to bring about his own death; and
(C)intoxication of the member was not the proximate cause of his death; and
(2)is survived by a survivor, parent, or sibling, lump-sum payment of $50,000 shall be made to his survivor if the survivor received more than one half of his support from such member, or if such member is not survived by any survivor (including a survivor who did not receive more than one half of his support from such member), to his parent or sibling if the parent or sibling received more

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia § 5-716 (Survivor benefits and annuities.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronda Nunnally v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
80 A.3d 1004 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
27 case citations
Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board
991 A.2d 763 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
8 case citations
Matthews Ex Rel. Matthews v. District of Columbia
875 A.2d 650 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
8 case citations
Rodrigues Rife v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board
940 A.2d 964 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
7 case citations
Smallwood v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
956 A.2d 705 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
4 case citations
Cheryl Rivera v. Jack Lew
99 A.3d 269 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
3 case citations

Legislative History

Sept. 1, 1916, ch. 433, § 12(k); Aug. 21, 1957, 71 Stat. 396, Pub. L. 85-157, § 3; Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1137, Pub. L. 91-509, § 1(8); Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 642, Pub. L. 92-410, title II, § 201(a)(4); Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1040, Pub. L. 93-407, title I, § 121(b)(4), (5); Nov. 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 1371, Pub. L. 95-179; Nov. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 866, Pub. L. 96-122,§§ 206(a)(1), 207(a)(2), 209(b); June 22, 1990, D.C. Law 8-145, § 2, 37 DCR 2977; Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 505, Pub. L. 104-52, § 630(b); Nov. 19, 1997, 111 Stat. 2184, Pub. L. 105-100, § 152(b)(1); Oct. 19, 2000, D.C. Law 13-172, § 1102, 47 DCR 6308; Oct. 3, 2001, D.C. Law 14-28, § 2102, 48 DCR 6981; Apr. 13, 2005, D.C. Law 15-354, § 13(e), 52 DCR 2638; Mar. 21, 2009, D.C. Law 17-321, § 2(a), 56 DCR 222; Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3033, Pub. L. 111-282, § 4(b)(5); Sept. 26, 2012, D.C. Law 19-171, § 40, 59 DCR 6190; May 1, 2013, D.C. Law 19-301, § 2, 60 DCR 2310; May 1, 2013, D.C. Law 19-314, § 2(e), 60 DCR 3466

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗