District of Columbia Statutes
§ 48-1103 — Prohibited acts.
District of Columbia § 48-1103
This text of District of Columbia § 48-1103 (Prohibited acts.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 48-1103 (2026).
Text
(1)Except as authorized by Chapter 16B of Title 7 [ § 7-1671.01 et seq.], it is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inhale, ingest, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance; except that it shall be lawful for any person 21 years of age or older to use, or possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to possess or use marijuana if such possession or use is lawful under § 48-904.01(a) , or to use, or possess with intent to u se, drug paraphernalia to grow, possess, harvest, or process cannabis plants, the growth, possession, harvesting or processing of whic
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DEVON SHARP v. UNITED STATES
132 A.3d 161 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Howerton v. United States
964 A.2d 1282 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Gilliam v. United States
46 A.3d 360 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
United States v. Debruhl
993 A.2d 571 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
Scott v. United States
878 A.2d 486 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
Ramirez v. United States
49 A.3d 1246 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
Goines v. United States
964 A.2d 141 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Chavez-Quintanilla v. United States
788 A.2d 564 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Whitley v. United States
783 A.2d 629 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATES
156 A.3d 102 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
Rose v. United States
49 A.3d 1252 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
Dawkins v. United States
987 A.2d 470 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
SURUR FATUMABAHIRTU v. UNITED STATES
148 A.3d 260 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Fatumabahirtu v. United States
26 A.3d 322 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2011)
Antwan Buchanan v. United States
165 A.3d 297 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
TAIJUIAN HENSON v. UNITED STATES
122 A.3d 899 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
TRAVIS MCRAE v. UNITED STATES
148 A.3d 269 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Nelson v. United States
55 A.3d 389 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2012)
In re: J.W.
100 A.3d 1091 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2014)
Jerome Proctor, Jr.
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
Legislative History
Sept. 17, 1982, D.C. Law 4-149, § 4, 29 DCR 3369; Mar. 14, 1985, D.C. Law 5-159, § 14, 32 DCR 30; June 13, 1990, D.C. Law 8-138, § 3(b), 37 DCR 2638; Apr. 9, 1997, D.C. Law 11-213, § 2(c), 43 DCR 4990; Apr. 24, 2007, D.C. Law 16-306, § 227(c), 53 DCR 8610; July 23, 2010, D.C. Law 18-189, § 5(b), 57 DCR 3019; July 27, 2010, D.C. Law 18-210, § 3(d), 57 DCR 4798; Sept. 26, 2012, D.C. Law 19-171, § 138, 59 DCR 6190; June 11, 2013, D.C. Law 19-317, § 254, 60 DCR 2064; July 17, 2014, D.C. Law 20-126, § 409, 61 DCR 3482; Feb. 26, 2015, D.C. Law 20-153, § 3, 62 DCR 880
Nearby Sections
15
§ 48-1001
Definitions.§ 48-1003
Notice of a drug free zone.§ 48-1004
Prohibition.§ 48-1005
Penalties.§ 48-1006
Reporting.§ 48-102
Definitions — “Drug”; “food”.§ 48-105
Complaints to be investigated.§ 48-108.01
Administrative remedies for enforcement.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 48-1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/48-1103.