District of Columbia Statutes
§ 22-901 — Definitions.
District of Columbia § 22-901
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 22Criminal Offenses and Penalties.
Ch. 9Commercial Counterfeiting.
This text of District of Columbia § 22-901 (Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 22-901 (2026).
Text
For the purposes of this chapter, the term:
(1)“Counterfeit mark” means:
(A)Any unauthorized reproduction or copy of intellectual property; or
(B)Intellectual property affixed to any item knowingly sold, offered for sale, manufactured, or distributed, or identifying services offered or rendered, without the authority of the owner of the intellectual property.
(2)“Intellectual property” means any trademark, service mark, trade name, label, term, picture, seal, word, or advertisement or any combination of these adopted or used by a person to identify such person’s goods or services and which is lawfully filed for record in the Office of the Secretary of State of any state or which the exclusive right to reproduce is guaranteed under the laws of the United States or the District o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morris v. United States
728 A.2d 1210 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
Alfaro v. United States
859 A.2d 149 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Mary L. Jones v. United States
308 F.2d 307 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)
Phenis v. United States
909 A.2d 138 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
Jones v. United States
813 A.2d 220 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Lee v. United States
831 A.2d 378 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
McCloud v. United States
781 A.2d 744 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
Smith v. United States
813 A.2d 216 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Regalado v. United States
572 A.2d 416 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Carson v. United States
556 A.2d 1076 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Johnson v. United States
631 A.2d 871 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Edwards v. United States
767 A.2d 241 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
Richardson v. United States
927 A.2d 1137 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Young v. United States
745 A.2d 943 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
Jenkins v. United States
870 A.2d 27 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
Dauphine v. United States
73 A.3d 1029 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
Williams v. United States
686 A.2d 552 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
York v. United States
803 A.2d 1009 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
United States v. Crockett
861 A.2d 604 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Raboya v. Shrybman & Associates
777 F. Supp. 58 (District of Columbia, 1991)
Legislative History
June 3, 1997, D.C. Law 11-271, § 2, 43 DCR 4585
Nearby Sections
15
§ 22-1001
Definitions and penalties.§ 22-1002
Other cruelties to animals.§ 22-1002.01
Reporting requirements.§ 22-1005
Issuance of search warrants.§ 22-1006.01
Penalty for engaging in animal fighting.§ 22-1006.02
Possession of an implement of animal fighting.§ 22-1008
Relief of impounded animals.§ 22-1009
Keeping or using place for fighting or baiting of fowls or animals; arrest without warrant.§ 22-101
Definition and penalty.§ 22-1011
Neglect of sick or disabled animals.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 22-901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/22-901.