District of Columbia Statutes

§ 22-901 — Definitions.

District of Columbia § 22-901
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 22Criminal Offenses and Penalties.
Ch. 9Commercial Counterfeiting.

This text of District of Columbia § 22-901 (Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.C. Code § 22-901 (2026).

Text

For the purposes of this chapter, the term:

(1)“Counterfeit mark” means:
(A)Any unauthorized reproduction or copy of intellectual property; or
(B)Intellectual property affixed to any item knowingly sold, offered for sale, manufactured, or distributed, or identifying services offered or rendered, without the authority of the owner of the intellectual property.
(2)“Intellectual property” means any trademark, service mark, trade name, label, term, picture, seal, word, or advertisement or any combination of these adopted or used by a person to identify such person’s goods or services and which is lawfully filed for record in the Office of the Secretary of State of any state or which the exclusive right to reproduce is guaranteed under the laws of the United States or the District o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. United States
728 A.2d 1210 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
48 case citations
Alfaro v. United States
859 A.2d 149 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
46 case citations
Mary L. Jones v. United States
308 F.2d 307 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)
42 case citations
Phenis v. United States
909 A.2d 138 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
23 case citations
Jones v. United States
813 A.2d 220 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
22 case citations
Lee v. United States
831 A.2d 378 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
21 case citations
McCloud v. United States
781 A.2d 744 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
16 case citations
Smith v. United States
813 A.2d 216 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
14 case citations
Regalado v. United States
572 A.2d 416 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
13 case citations
Carson v. United States
556 A.2d 1076 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
12 case citations
Johnson v. United States
631 A.2d 871 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
12 case citations
Edwards v. United States
767 A.2d 241 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
11 case citations
Richardson v. United States
927 A.2d 1137 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
9 case citations
Young v. United States
745 A.2d 943 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2000)
8 case citations
Jenkins v. United States
870 A.2d 27 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)
7 case citations
Dauphine v. United States
73 A.3d 1029 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)
6 case citations
Williams v. United States
686 A.2d 552 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
5 case citations
York v. United States
803 A.2d 1009 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
5 case citations
United States v. Crockett
861 A.2d 604 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
3 case citations
Raboya v. Shrybman & Associates
777 F. Supp. 58 (District of Columbia, 1991)
2 case citations

Legislative History

June 3, 1997, D.C. Law 11-271, § 2, 43 DCR 4585

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 22-901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/22-901.