District of Columbia Statutes
§ 11-944 — Contempt power.
District of Columbia § 11-944
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 11Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]
Ch. 9Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Subch. IIIMiscellaneous Provisions.
This text of District of Columbia § 11-944 (Contempt power.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 11-944 (2026).
Text
(a)Subject to the limitation described in subsection (b), and in addition to the powers conferred by section 402 of title 18, United States Code, the Superior Court, or a judge thereof, may punish for disobedience of an order or for contempt committed in the presence of the court.
(1)In any proceeding for custody of a minor child conducted in the Family Division of the Superior Court under paragraph (1) or (4) of section 11-1101, no individual may be imprisoned for civil contempt for more than 12 months (except as provided in paragraph (2)), pursuant to the contempt power described in subsection (a), for disobedience of an order or for contempt committed in the presence of the court. This limitation does not apply to imprisonment for criminal contempt or for any other criminal violati
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Khaalis v. United States
408 A.2d 313 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Carter v. United States
684 A.2d 331 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Caldwell v. United States
595 A.2d 961 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Brooks v. United States
686 A.2d 214 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Payne v. United States
932 A.2d 1095 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Oliver v. United States
682 A.2d 186 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)
Skyers v. United States
619 A.2d 931 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Morgan v. Foretich
564 A.2d 1 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)
Thompson v. United States
690 A.2d 479 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
In Re Kraut
580 A.2d 1305 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
In Re Warner
905 A.2d 233 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)
In Re Dixon
853 A.2d 708 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
Matter of Neal
475 A.2d 390 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1984)
Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United States
182 A.3d 123 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2018)
ALAZAJUAN M. GRAY and CLIFTON SMITH v. UNITED STATES.
147 A.3d 791 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
In re L.G.
639 A.2d 603 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994)
Bell v. United States
806 A.2d 228 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
IN RE Q.B. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
116 A.3d 450 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
In Re Tinney
518 A.2d 1009 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)
Matter of Scott
517 A.2d 310 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)
Legislative History
July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 487, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 111; Sept. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 633, Pub. L. 101-97, § 2(a)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-101
Judicial power.§ 11-1101
Jurisdiction of the Family Court.§ 11-1104
Administration.§ 11-1106
Reports to Congress.§ 11-1201
Exclusive jurisdiction.§ 11-1202
Abolition of other remedies.§ 11-1203
Rules and regulations.§ 11-1301
Continuation of Branch.§ 11-1302
Sessions.§ 11-1322
Arbitration and conciliation.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 11-944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/11-944.