District of Columbia Statutes
§ 11-923 — Criminal jurisdiction; commitment.
District of Columbia § 11-923
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Title 11Organization and Jurisdiction of the Courts. [Enacted title]
Ch. 9Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Subch. IIJurisdiction.
This text of District of Columbia § 11-923 (Criminal jurisdiction; commitment.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.C. Code § 11-923 (2026).
Text
(a)The Superior Court has jurisdiction over all criminal cases pending in the District of Columbia Court of General Sessions before the effective date of the District of Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970.
(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Superior Court has jurisdiction of any criminal case under any law applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia.
(2)The Superior Court shall not have jurisdiction of any criminal case under any law applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia begun in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia under section 11-502(2) by the return of an indictment or the filing of an information during the eighteen-month period beginning on such effective date.
(1)With respect to any criminal case over which th
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Gary Stewart
104 F.3d 1377 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Crutchfield v. United States
779 A.2d 307 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
Long v. United States
940 A.2d 87 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Purcell v. United States
594 A.2d 527 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
Rahim v. U.S. Parole Commission
77 F. Supp. 3d 140 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Dyson v. United States
848 A.2d 603 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2004)
James Clark v. D. Justin Taylor
627 F.2d 284 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Ivan C. Thompson v. United States of America, Gregory T. Givens v. United States
548 F.2d 1031 (D.C. Circuit, 1976)
Ford v. United States
616 A.2d 1245 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Francis v. United States
715 A.2d 894 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1998)
MICHAEL T. MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES
145 A.3d 1014 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2016)
Emero Sanchez Tornero v. United States
161 A.3d 675 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2017)
Potts v. United States
919 A.2d 1127 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Colbert v. United States
601 A.2d 603 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Valentine v. Elliott
819 A.2d 968 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2003)
Anderson v. United States Parole Commission
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Brown v. U.S. Parole Commission
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Cunningham v. District of Columbia
(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2020)
Gorbey v. District of Columbia
(District of Columbia, 2009)
Hammett v. U.S. Parole Commission
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Legislative History
July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 486, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 111
Nearby Sections
15
§ 11-101
Judicial power.§ 11-1101
Jurisdiction of the Family Court.§ 11-1104
Administration.§ 11-1106
Reports to Congress.§ 11-1201
Exclusive jurisdiction.§ 11-1202
Abolition of other remedies.§ 11-1203
Rules and regulations.§ 11-1301
Continuation of Branch.§ 11-1302
Sessions.§ 11-1322
Arbitration and conciliation.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
District of Columbia § 11-923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/dc/11-923.